Topraksız Domates Yetiştiriciliğinde Kokopite Karşı Alternatif Yetiştirme Ortamı Olarak Tarımsal Sanayi Atıklardan Elde Edilen Kompostun Değerlendirilmesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i3.454-459.5703Anahtar Kelimeler:
Topraksız tarım- Kompost- Domates- Verim- Tarımsal atıkÖzet
Sürdürülebilir topraksız tarım için çevre dostu ve yenilenebilir materyallerin önemi her geçen gün artmaktadır. Yeşil ve organik atıklardan elde edilen kompost bu materyallerden biridir. Bu çalışmada elma, üzüm ve domates posalarından elde edilen kompostun topraksız domates yetiştiriciliğinde etkileri araştırılmıştır. Elma, üzüm ve domates atıkları meyve suyu ve salça fabrikalarından temin edilmiştir. Elma, üzüm ve domates atıkları ayrı ayrı kompostlaştırılmıştır. Kompost yapımında ana materyale (2m3) 200 dm3 ahır gübresi, 5 kg kireç ve 5 kg üre ilave edilmiştir. Kompost yapımı 22 hafta sürmüştür. Denemede 9 farklı ortam kullanılmış olup, bunlar; kokopit: perlit (2:1) (Kontrol); domates kompostu: perlit (2:1) (D); elma kompostu: perlit (2:1) (E); üzüm kompostu:perlit (2:1) (Ü); domates: elma: üzüm kompostu: perlit (1:1:1:1) (DEÜ); domates kompostu: kokopit: perlit (1:1:1) (DC); elma kompostu: kokopit: perlit (1:1:1) (EC); üzüm kompostu: kokopit: perlit (1:1:1) (ÜC) ve DEÜ kompostu: kokopit: perlit (1:1:1) (DEÜC). Ortamlar hacim esasına göre belirlenmiştir. Besin solüsyonu çiçeklenmeye kadar 2,0 dS/m ve çiçeklenmeden sonra 2,2 dS/m, pH:5,9 şeklinde uygulanmıştır. En yüksek pazarlanabilir verim elma, domates ve üzüm kompostu + kokopit uygulamasında 286,59 ton/ha olmuştur. Kompost kullanılması pazarlanabilir verimde kontrole göre %39,73 artış sağlanmıştır. Vitamin C kontrolde en yüksek çıkarken, pH ve suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarı değişmemiştir. Kompost kullanılması domates meyvelerinde çiçek burnu çürüklüğünü azaltmış, yaprak kuru ağırlığını artırmıştır. Sonuç olarak, denemede üzüm ve özellikle elma posasından elde edilen kompostun topraksız tarımda domates yetiştiriciliğinde başarıyla kullanılabildiği ve ticari ortamlardan biri olan kokpite göre daha etkili olduğu anlaşılmıştır.
Referanslar
Atzori G, Nissim WG, Rodolfi L. 2020. Algae and Bioguano as promising source of organic fertilizers. J. Appl. Phycol, 32: 3971–3981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02261-7
Barrett GE, Alexander PD, Robinson JS, Bragg NC. 2016. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems—A review. Sci. Hortic., 212: 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030
Branch K, Esfahan I. 2010. Effects of the substrate on tomato in soilless culture. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 6(6): 923-927.
Canellas LP, Olivares FL. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014, 1: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3
Ceglie FG, Bustamante MA, Ben Amara M, Tittarelli F. 2015. The challenge of peat substitution in organic seedling production: Optimization of growing media formulation through mixture design and response surface analysis. PLoS One 10:1–14. e0128600. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0128600
Cendón Y, Moldes A, Barral MT. 2008. Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost as a growing media component for potted plant production. Acta Hortic. 779, 591–598. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.779.76
Chrysargyris A, Stamatakis A, Prasad M, Tzortzakis N. 2018. Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost and/or fertigation as peat substituent for pepper seedlings production. Waste Biomass Valor9, 2285-2294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0124-6
Cozzolino V, Di Meo V, Monda H, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. 2016. The molecular characteristics of compost affect plant growth, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil microbial community composition. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 52: 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1046-8
Dehnavard S, Souri MK, Mardanlu S. 2017. Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40(3): 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1240191
Diacono M, Montemurro F. 2019. Olive pomace compost in organic emmer crop: yield, soil properties, and heavy metals’ fate in plant and soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19 (1): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-0010-3
Eklind Y, Rämert B, Wivstad M. 2001. Evaluation of growing media containing farmyard manure compost, household waste compost or chicken manure for the propagation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) transplants. Biol. Agric. Hortic, 19: 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2001.9754919
Farrell M, Jones DL. 2010. Food waste composting: Its use as a peat replacement. Waste Manag. 30: 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.032
Giménez A, Fernández JA, Pascual JA, Ros M, López-Serrano M, Egea-Gilabert C. 2019. An agroindustrial compost as alternative to peat for production of baby leaf red lettuce in a floating system. Scientia Horticulturae, 246: 907-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.080
Hagassou D, Francia E, Ronga D, Buti M. 2019. Blossom end-rot in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): A multi-disciplinary overview of inducing factors and control strategies. Scientia Horticulturae, 249: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta. 2019.01.042
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1938. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. Circulation No. 347, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc2.ark:/13960/t51g1sb8j
Íñiguez-Covarrubias G, Ramírez-Meda W, Bernal-Casillas JDJ, Virgen-Calleros G. 2022. Use of By-Products from the Tequila Industry. Part 12: Composted Agave Bagasse for Growing Grape Tomatoes. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13(9): 1227-1232. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps. 2022.139083
Kowalska M, Delre A, Wolf O. 2021. EU Ecolabel Criteria for growing media and soil improvers. JRC Science for Policy Report. 158p.
Massa D, Bonetti A, Cacini S, Faraloni C, Prisa D, Tuccio L, Petruccelli R. 2019. Soilless tomato grown under nutritional stress increases green biomass but not yield or quality in presence of biochar as growing medium. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 60(6): 871-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00169-x
Massa D, Magán JJ, Montesano FF, Tzortzakis N. 2020. Minimizing water and nutrient losses from soilless cropping in southern Europe. Agric. Water Manag., 241, 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106395
Massa D, Prisa D, Lazzereschi S, Cacini S, Burchi G. 2018. Heterogeneous response of two bedding plants to peat substitution by two green composts. Hort. Sci., 45: 164–172. https://doi.org/10.17221/1/2017-HORTSCI
Mazuela P, Urrestarazu M, Salas MC, Guillén C, Sánchez JA. 2004. Comparison between different fertigation parameters and yield using pure compost and coir waste fibre in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv Pitenza) crop by soilless culture. Acta Hortic. 659: 653-656. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.659.84
Miyama Y, Kamiyama K, Tsujimoto W, Taira S, Terabayashi S. 2022. Effects of defoliation on the occurrence of internal browning in tomatoes grown in soilless cultures. Environmental Control in Biology, 60(2): 103-108. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.60.103
Nappi P, Barberis R. 1993. Compost as growing medium: Chemical, physical and biological aspects. Acta Hortic., 342, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.342.28
Prasad M, Maher MJ. 2001. The use of composted green waste (CGW) as a growing medium component. Acta Hortic., 549: 107–113.
Putra PA. Yuliando H. 2015. Soilless culture system to support water use efficiency and product quality: A review. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc., 3: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aaspro.2015.01.054
Raviv M, Lieth JH, Bar-Tal A. 2019. Soilless Culture: Theory and Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands 691 P.
Raviv M. 2013. Composts in growing media: What’s new and what’s next? Acta Hortic., 982: 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.982.3
Reis M, Inácio H, Rosa A, Caccedilio J, Monteiro A. 2001. Grape marc compost as an alternative growing media for greenhouse tomato. Acta Hortic. 554: 75-82. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.554.6
Schmilewski G. 2017. Growing media constituents used in the EU in 2013. Acta Hortic., 1168: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1168.12
Stoffella PJ, Kahn BA. 2001. Compost utilization in horticultural cropping systems. CRC press.
Traka-Mavrona E, Gerasopoulos D, Pritsa T, Maloupa E. 2001. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato in relation to substrate and nutrient source in a soilless culture system. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Growing Media and Hydroponics, Kassandra, Macedonia, Greece, 31 August-6 September, 1999.
Zoes V, Paré T, Dinel H, Dumontet S, Pasquale V, Scopa A. 2011. Growth and yield of tomato cultivated on composted duck excreta enriched wood shavings and source-separated municipal solid waste. Ital. J. Agron., 6: 6–10. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.e2
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
