Kentlerde Yeşil Alanların Yeterliliğinin ve I-Tree Canopy ile Hava Kalitesine Olan Katkılarının Belirlenmesi: Denizli Merkez İlçeleri ve Kent Merkezi Örneği

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i11.2146-2154.6371

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yeşil altyapı- hava kalitesi- yeşil alan yeterliliği- i-Tree Canopy- Erişilebilirlik- Denizli

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı Denizli kent merkezi ve yakın çevresinde bulunan yeşil alanların yeterliliğinin ve kentin hava kalitesini arttırmaya yönelik sağladığı hizmetlerinin ölçülmesidir. Bu bağlamda çalışma alanı olarak Denizli merkez ilçeleri (Pamukkale ve Merkezefendi) ve kent merkezinde yer alan yeşil alanlar değerlendirme kapsamında ele alınmıştır. Yeşil alanların yeterliliği; alanın erişilebilirliği ve mahallelerin nüfus oranı çerçevesinde irdelenmiştir. Öte yandan yeşil alanların, hava kalitesinin bazı kriterleri üzerinde sağladığı faydalar “i-Tree Canopy” yazılımı aracılığıyla tahmin edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına aktif yeşil alanlardan sadece iki tanesine erişilememektedir. Çalışma alanı sınırları içerisinde bulunan 111 mahalle içerisinde sadece 11 mahallede kişi başına düşen yeşil alan miktarının yeterli sınırın üzerine çıktığı tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra aktif yeşil alanların yıllık yaklaşık 4.717.371 ton karbon monoksit, 28.032.093 ton Azot Dioksit, 276.147.567 ton ozon, 21.727.132 ton Kükürt Dioksit, 12.564.544 ton PM 2,5, 55.519.883 ton PM10 uzaklaştırdığı, 181.805 ton karbondioksit tutulduğu ve 213.603 ton karbondioksit depolandığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma ile Denizli kent merkezindeki yeşil alanların sosyal açıdan yeterlilikleri değerlendirilirken, kente olan ekolojik ve ekonomik katkıları da ortaya konulmuştur. Yapılan değerlendirmeler mevcut durumu ortaya koyarken kent planlama çalışmalarına da katkı sağlayacaktır.

Referanslar

Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H. 2001. Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy. 70:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X

Akimoto H. 2003. Global air quality and pollution. Science 302, 1716–1719. 10.1126/science.1092666

Anonim. 2019. https://adres.denizli.bel.tr/sorumluluk/# Erişim Tarihi:12.09.2019

Anonim. 2020.https://www.nrpa.org/ Erişim Tarihi:20.07.2020

Avrupa Komisyonu. 2013. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. COM (2013) 249 final, Brussels, 2013 11 p. Flynn KM.

Badiu DL, Nita A, Iojă CI, Niţă MR. 2019. Disentangling the connections: A network analysis of approaches to urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41 (2019) 211–220 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.013

Baró F, Chaparro L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Langemeyer J, Nowak DJ, Terradas, J. 2014. Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate changemitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio 43 (4),466–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x

Bekkouche A. 1997. L'espace vert urbain public: entre pratique et conception. Insaniyat - Revue algerienne d'anthropologie et de science social. Espace habites, 2, 59-76.

Benedict MA, McMahon ET. 2002. Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st Century Renewable Resources Journal, 20 (3) (2002), pp. 12-17

Bilgili BC, Şahin, AÇK. 2011. Van Kenti Kamusal Yeşil Alanlarının Yeterliliğinin Ulaşılabilirlik Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21 (2), 98-103. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyutbd/issue/21980/236007

Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/HAP_BoD_results_May2018_final. pdf, accessed 20 April 2020).

Burdziej J. 2012. A Web-based spatial decision support system for accessibility analysis—concepts and methods. Appl Geomat 4, 75–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0057-x

Burdziej J. 2009. Multi-criteria spatial analysis of land accessibility for seismic operations. Annals of Geomatics 2(32):23–32

Burns CM, Inglis AD. 2007, Measuring food access in Melbourne: access to healthy and fast foods by car, bus and foot in an urban municipality in Melbourne, Health & place, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 877–885 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.005

Comber A, Brunsdon C, Green E. 2008. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 103–114.

Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. 2020: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Erkip Beler F. 1997, The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara', Cities, vol. 14, issue 6, pp. 353-361. 10.1126/science.1092666 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00026-7

Faiz A. 1993. Automotive emissions in developing countries-relative implications for global warming: acidification and urban air quality. Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract. 27, 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(93)90057-R

Felder S, Brinkmann H. 2002, Spatial allocation of emergency medical services: minimising the death rate or providing equal access, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 32, no. 1 (2002), pp. 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00074-6

Florides GA, Christodoulides P. 2008. Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environment International 35 (2009) 390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.007

Global health estimates. 2016: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000-2016. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2018 (https://www.who.int/healthinfo/ global_burden_disease/estimates/en/, accessed 20 April 2020).

Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019

Gupta K, Roy A, Luthra K, Maithani S, Mahavir. 2016. GIS based analysis for assessing the accessibility at hierarchical levels of urban green spaces Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18 (2016) 198–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.005

IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

ITC. 2020 – i-Tree Canopy 2020. The Technical Notes of Software. U.S. Forest Service and Davey Tree Expert Company Cooperation. Available online: https://canopy.itreetools.org/references

Jayasooriya VM, AWM, Ng, Muthukumaran S, Perera BJC. 2017. Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 21 (2017) 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.007

Kopar İ, Zengin M. 2009. Coğrafi Faktörlere Bağlı Olarak Erzurum Kentinde Hava Kalitesinin Zamansal ve Mekânsal Değişiminin Belirlenmesi. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi , 0 (53) , 51-69 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tcd/issue/21228/228416

Kumar R, Joseph AE. 2006 Air pollution concentrations of PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 at ambient and Kerbsite and their correlation in metro city--Mumbai. Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Aug;119(1-3):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-9022-7. Epub 2006 Mar 16. PMID: 16541301.

Nicholls S. 2001. Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: a case study using GIS Managing Leisure 6, 201–219 (2001)

Nowak DJ, Crane DE. 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollunation. 116 (2002), ss 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7

Nowak DJ. 1994. Air Pollution Removal by Chicago’s Urban Forest. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem, Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project.,pp. 63–81.

Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC. 2006. Air pollution removal by urban treesand shrubs in the United States. Urban For. Urban Green. 4, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007

Nowak DJ, Mchale PJ, Ibarra M, Crane D, Stevens JC, Luley CJ. 1998. Modeling the Effects of Urban Vegetation on Air Pollution. Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XII. Springer, pp. 399–407.

Oh K, Jeong S. 2007, Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS, Landscape and urban planning, vol. 82, pp. 25–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.014

Olvera LD, Plat D, Pochet P. 2003, Transportation conditions and access to services in a context of urban sprawl and deregulation. The case of Dar es Salaam. Transport policy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 287–298. Doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00056-8

Önder S, Polat AT. 2012. Kentsel Açık-Yeşil Alanların Kent Yaşamındaki Yeri ve Önemi. Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri 19 Mayıs 2012 / Konya

Perkins HA, Heynen N, Wilson J. 2004, Inequitable access to urban reforestation: the impact of urban political economy on housing tenure and urban forests. Cities, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.002

Pred A. 1977. City Systems in Advanced Economies, London, England, Hutchinson.

Public health and environment [online database], Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/ public-health-and-environment/GHO/public-health-and-environment, accessed 20 April 2020.

Quatrini V, Tomao A, Corona P, Ferrari B, Masini E, Agrimi M. 2019. Is new always better than old? Accessibility and usability of the urban green areas of the municipality of Rome, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 37, 2019, Pages 126-134, ISSN 1618-8667, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.015

Rosero-Bixby L. 2004. Spatial access to health care in Costa Rica and its equity: a GIS-based study, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1271–1284. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00322-8

The Landscape Institute. 2019 Landscape Institute. Green infrastructure: connected and multifunctional landscape-Position document, London: Landscape Institute. https://landscapewpstorage01.blob.core.windows.net/www-landscapeinstitute-org/2016/03/GreenInfrastructurepositionstatement13May09.pdf Erişim tarihi: 29.06.2020

TÜİK. 2019. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr Erişim tarihi: 04.11.2019

Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Ka´zmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas usinggreen infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plann. 81, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

UA. 2019– Urban Atlas 2019. Copernicus The European Earth Observation Programme. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/local/urban-atlas

Wang D, Brown G, Liu Y. 2015.The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks,Landscape and Urban Planning,Volume 133,2015, Pages 53-66,ISSN 0169-2046,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007

Wang J, Banzhaf E. 2018 Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review. Ecological Indicators 85 (2018) 758–772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind. 2017.09.018

Wang Z, Bai Z, Yu H, Zhang J, Zhu T. 2004. Regulatory standards related to building energy conservation and indoor-air-quality during rapid urbanization in China. Energy Build. 36, 1299–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.09.013

Yang J, Mcbride J, Zhou J, Sun Z. 2005a. The urban forest in Beijing and its rolein air pollution reduction. Urban For. Urban Green. 3, 65–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2004.09.001

Yang T, Matus K, Paltsev S, Reilly J. 2005b. Economic benefits of air pollution regulation in the USA: An integrated approach. MIT JPSPGC Rep. 113, 26.

Yayınlanmış

2023-11-27

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Doğan, D., Zengin, M., Özdede, S., & Yılmaz, F. Çağlar. (2023). Kentlerde Yeşil Alanların Yeterliliğinin ve I-Tree Canopy ile Hava Kalitesine Olan Katkılarının Belirlenmesi: Denizli Merkez İlçeleri ve Kent Merkezi Örneği . Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 11(11), 2146–2154. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i11.2146-2154.6371

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi