Evaluation of Some Agro-morphological Characteristics of Dwarf Snap Bean Genotypes Collected from Erzurum Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i6.1087-1095.5920Keywords:
Snap bean, Dwarf, Yield, Genotypes, ErzurumAbstract
The study was conducted in the trial area of the Department of Horticulture at Atatürk University during the 2022 cropping season to evaluate some agro-morphological characteristics of the dwarf-type snap bean genotypes collected from Erzurum along with the commercial cultivars SARIKIZ and GINA have been widely cultivated there. The genotypes tested in the study showed statistically significant variations in terms of all parameters examined. Genotypes ERZ PA 28 and ERZ UZ 36 reached the earliest fresh maturity time by 58 days. The genotype with the longest pod was ERZ NR 104 (17.35 cm); the genotypes with the widest pod were ERZ UZ 36 (15.29 mm) and ERZ TO 49 (15.43 mm); and the genotype with the thickest pod was ERZ İS13 (8.75 mm). The ERZ TO 49 genotype had the most pods per plant (32.41), the highest yield per plant (217.73 g), and the highest yield per square meter (1360.79 g/m2), while the ERZ UZ 35 genotype produced the heaviest average pod weight (8.63 g). Additionally, in terms of the number of pods per plant, yield per plant, and yield per square meter, ERZ PA 28 has been determined to produce the results that are closest to ERZ TO 49. According to the study’s findings, ERZ IS 13, ERZ PA 28, ERZ UZ 32, ERZ UZ 35, ERZ UZ 36, ERZ TO 48, ERZ TO 49, ERZ NR 104, ERZ PS 111, ERZ PS 115, and ERZ PS 116 genotypes yields per square meter was founded that higher than commercial cultivars and other genotypes, can offer the producer a sufficient level of yield.
References
Abera B, Berhane M, Nebiyu A, Ruelle ML, McAlvay A, Asfaw Z, Tesfaye A, Woldu Z. 2020. Diversity, use and production of farmers’ varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) in southwestern and northeastern Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 67(2): 339-356. Doi:10.1007/s10722-019-00877-4
Alemu Y, Alamirew S, Dessalegn L. 2017. Correlation and path analysis of green pod yield and its components in snap bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) genotypes. International Journal of Research, 4: 30-36. Doi: 10.22259/ijraf.0401005
Asciogul TK. 2016. Determination of genotypes as a genitor in bean breeding programs by agromorphological and molecular characterization. Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Horticulture, PhD Thesis, 153s.
Asciogul TK, Sen F, Nemli S, Esiyok D, Bozokalfa MK, Tanyolaç MB. 2020. Biochemical components of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Acta Hortic. 1297: 293-300 Doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1297.40
Balkaya A. 1999. Researches over collection of genetic resources of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Blacksea Region, and determining phenological and morphological qualities and selecting types conditioning fresh consumption with single selection method. Horticultural Department of O.M.U Science Research Institutes, Doctorate Thesis (not pressed), 199 pages.
Balkaya A, Ergün A. 2008. Diversity and use of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) populations from Samsun, Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 36(3): 189-197. Doi:10.1080/01140670809510235
Balkaya A, Odabas MS. 2002. Determination of the seed characteristics in some significant snap bean varieties grown in Samsun, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(4): 382-387. Doi:10.3923/pjbs.2002.382.387
Balkaya A, Yanmaz, R. 2003. Identified through morphological features and protein markers of commercial varieties with some fresh bean variety candidates. Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Agricultural Sciences Journal, 9(2):182-188. Doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000788
Bekar NK, Sağlam N, Balkaya A. 2019. Evaluation of variation of in terms of pod quality and pod traits of some snap bean genotypes. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1): 127-135. Doi: 10.29133/yyutbd.502836
Blair MW, Chaves A, Tofiño A, Calderón JF, Palacio JD. 2010. Extensive diversity and inter-genepool introgression in a world-wide collection of indeterminate snap bean accessions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120: 1381-1391. Doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1262-4
Broughton WJ, Hernàdez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J. 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) model food legumes. Plant Soil, 252: 55-128. Doi:10.1023/A:1024146710611
Çelikel G, Tunar M. 1996. Sonbahar ve İlkbahar Yetiştiriciliğine Uygun Yer ve Sırık Taze Fasulye Çeşitlerinin Belirlenmesi. Gap I Sebze Tarım Sempozyumu, 7-10.
Çirka M, Çiftçi V. 2016. Collection and phenological evaluation of fresh bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm grown at South of Eastern Anatolia. Türkiye Tarımsal Araștırmalar Dergisi, 3(2): 109-121.
Chaurasia, S. Green beans. In: Jaiswal AK (editors). Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Fruits and Vegetables. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier, pp. 289-300. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812780-3.00017-9
De Ron AM, Casquero PA, González AM, Santalla M. 2004. Environmental and genotypic effects on pod characteristics related to common bean quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190(4): 248-255. Doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00098.x
Erdinç Ç. 2012. Determination of genetic variation and antracnose disease (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. and Magn.) Lambs. Scrib.) resistance with phenotypic and molecular methods among some bean genotypes of Turkey. PhD Dissertation. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey.
Erdinç Ç, Türkmen Ö, Şensoy S. 2013. Determination of various vegetative characteristic of some bean genotypes of Turkey. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23(2): 112-125. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyutbd/issue/21974/235947
FAOSTAT. 2021. FAO Crop statistics. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize/ [Accessed 01.01.2023]
García-Fernández C, Campa A, Garzón AS, Miklas P, Ferreira JJ. 2021. GWAS of pod morphological and color characters in common bean. BMC Plant Biology, 21: 1-13. Doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02967-x
Gepts P. 1988. A middle American and an Andean common bean pool. In: P. Gepts (editors). Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 375-390. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2786-5_15
Gomez OJ, Blair MW, Frankow‐Lindberg BE, Gullberg U. 2004. Molecular and phenotypic diversity of common bean landraces from Nicaragua. Crop Science, 44(4): 1412-1418. Doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1412
Goutam P, Mulani S, Arvind G. 2001. Evaluation of genetic diversity in some pea varieties grown in North-Eastern hills. Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 6(2): 27-28.
Gül M, Parlak H. 2017. Input usage and problems in green bean production: a case of Burdur province, Turkey. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 6(1): 133-140. http://agrolifejournal. usamv.ro/pdf/vol.VI_1/vol6_1.pdf
Kar H, Balkaya A, Apaydın A. 2005. A research on the Performance of Some Green Bean Cultivars in Unheated Glasshouse During Early Spring Season in Samsun Ecological Conditions. GOU. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 22(1): 1-7. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gopzfd/issue/7342/96049
Kasim R, Kasim MU. 2015. Color changes and sugar accumulation in pods of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Gina) during development. Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 98(3): 286-292.
Khan MMR. 2003. Performance of lablab bean genotypes under different supports. MSc Thesis, Department of Horticulture, BSMRAU, Salna, Gazipur.
Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Traka-Mavrona E 2008 Snap bean. In: Prohens J, Nuej F (editors). Vegetables II: fabaceae, solanaceae, liliaceae and umbelliferae. Springer, pp 27–86. Doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74110-9_2
Krause W, Rodrigues R, Gonçalves LSA, Neto FVB, Leal NR. 2009. Genetic divergence in snap bean based on agronomic traits and resistance to bacterial wilt. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 9(3): 246-252.
Lázaro A, Villar B, Aceituno-Mata L, Tardio J, De la Rosa L. 2013. The Sierra Norte of Madrid: an agrobiodiversity refuge for common bean landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60(5): 1641-1654. Doi: 10.1007/s10722-012-9946-z
Luitel BP, Kalauni S, Bhandari BB. 2021. Morphological and yield traits of pole-type french bean genotypes. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council, 7: 10-21. Doi: 10.3126/jnarc.v7i1.36914
Madakbas SY, Ergin M. 2011. Morphological and phenological characterization of Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes and their present variation states. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(28): 6155-6166. Doi: 10.5897/AJAR11.1361
Madakbaş SY, Ergin M, Özçelik H, Sayar MT. 2010. Determination of plant traits of dwarf fresh bean lines with ayşe kadın’characteristics and gene loci for the resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. & Magnus) Lambs. Scrib.) disease. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, 4(2): 25-31. Doi:
Madakbaş SY, Kar H, Küçükomuzlu B. 2004. Determination of Productivity of Some Dwarf Green Bean Varieties in Carsamba Plain. GOU. Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 21 (2): 1-6. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gopzfd/issue/7344/96075
Martinez C, Ros G, Periago MJ, Lopez G, Ortuno J, Rincon F. 1995. Physico-chemical and sensory quality criteria of green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft+ Technologie, 28(5): 515-520. Doi: 10.1006/fstl.1995.0086
McGinnis L, Suszkiw J. 2006. Breeding better beans. Agricultural Research, 54(6): 12. Available from: https://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/ar/archive/2006/jun/beans0606.pdf [Accessed 17.01.2023]
Meza N, Rosas JC, Martín JP, Ortiz JM. 2013. Biodiversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Honduras, evidenced by morphological characterization. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60(4), 1329-1336. Doi: 10.1007/s10722-012-9922-7
Miles CA. 2002. Niche market dry bean variety trial. Small, 20(14): 13-45.
Muthuramu S, Paulpandi V K, Sakthivel S, Ramakrishnan K, Karthik R. 2015. Assessing the performance of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in district Virudhunagar of Tamilnadu. J. Krishi Vigyan, 3(2): 5-7. Doi: 10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00002.1
Nadeem MA, Karaköy T, Yeken MZ, Habyarimana E, Hatipoğlu R, Çiftçi V, Nawaz MA, Sönmez F, Shahid MQ, Yang SH, Chung G, Baloch FS. 2020. Phenotypic characterization of 183 Turkish common bean accessions for agronomic, trading, and consumer-preferred plant characteristics for breeding purposes. Agronomy, 10(2): 272. Doi:10.3390 /agronomy10020272
Neupane RK, Shrestha R, Vaidya ML, Bhattarai EM, Darai R. 2008. Agromorphological diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces of Jumla, Nepal. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Food Legumes Research Conference. October 18-22, 2005, New Delhi, India, pp. 639-648.
Nkhata W, Shimelis H, Melis R, Chirwa R, Mzengeza T, Mathew I, Shayanowako A. 2020. Population structure and genetic diversity analyses of common bean germplasm collections of East and Southern Africa using morphological traits and high-density SNP markers. PLoS One, 15(12): e0243238. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243238
Rana MK, Kamboj NK. 2017. Snap Bean. In Vegetable Crops Science, CRC Press: Cleveland, OH, USA, pp. 745-758.
Seymen M, Türkmen Ö, Paksoy M. 2010. Bazi bodur taze fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) çeşitlerinin konya koşullarinda verim ve bazi kalite unsurlarinin belirlenmesi. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 24(3): 37-40.
Sgarbieri VC, Whitaker JR. 1982. Physical, chemical, and nutritional properties of common bean (Phaseolus) proteins. Advances in Food Research, 28: 93-166. Doi:10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60111-1
Sharma A, Sharma GD, Singh Y, Sharma M, Katoch V, Sharma, KC. 2013. Optimum sowing dates and varieties for seed productivity of pole Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under north western Himalayas. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(48): 6196-6201. Doi:10.5897/ AJAR12.1770
Singh SP. 1999. Integrated genetic improvement. In: SP Singh (editors). Common Bean Improvement in the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 133-165. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9211-6_6
Stoilova T, Pereira G, de Sousa MM, Carnide V. 2005. Diversity in common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Bulgaria and Portugal. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(4): 443-448. https://hrcak.srce.hr/17308
TUIK. 2021. Turkish Statistical Institute. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr [Accessed 01.01.2023]
Ulukapı K, Onus AN. 2014. Phenotypic evaluation of some Turkish green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46(4): 1415-1420.
Vaz DDC, Morais OPD, Peixoto N. 2017. Agro-morphological characterization and genetic divergence assessment in bush snap bean genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47: 134-144. Doi: 10.1590/1983-40632016v4743525
Villa TCC, Maxted N, Scholten M, Ford-Lloyd B. 2005. Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant genetic resources, 3(3): 373-384. Doi: 10.1079/PGR200591
Yohannes S, Loha G, Gessese MK. 2020. Performance evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for yield and related traits at Areka, Southern Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, 2020: 1497530. Doi: 10.1155/2020/1497530
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
