The Quality of Kefir with Honey and with Banana Enriched with Almond Milk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i8.1337-1344.6007Keywords:
almond milk, kefir, functional food, honey, bananaAbstract
Kefir is a fermented product obtained from goat, sheep and cow milk as a result of lactic acid and ethyl alcohol fermentation. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the possibility of producing an alternative functional kefir product from almond milk. It was enriched with banana and honey to improve its sensory properties. Samples were stored at +4oC for 14 days. The pH and dry matter of samples containing almond milk were lower than those containing cow’s milk. Serum separation increased with the increase of almond milk ratio. The use of banana increased dry matter and viscosity, and decreased serum separation. pH, dry matter and viscosity decreased during storage. The highest L* value was observed in the control kefir produced from 100% cow’s milk, and the lowest in the samples containing honey and banana on the 1st day of storage. It can be said that the addition of honey increases the b* value and the addition of banana decreases the b* value. As almond milk ratio and storage time increased, bacteria counts decreased. The lactococci counts of the samples with banana added (except for the control) were higher than the others. In the samples with banana and honey, a higher increase in yeast count was observed during storage compared to plain kefir (control sample). It can be said that the use of almond milk reduces the general acceptability of kefir. Almond milk can be successfully used in kefir production as a substitute for cow’s milk, if sweeteners, fruit and thickeners are used.
References
Amiot M J, Aubert S, Gonnet M, Tacchini M. 1989. The phenolic compounds in honeys: preliminary study upon identification and family quantification [floral origin]. Apidologie (France), 20(2):115-25.
Bakirci I, Kavaz A. 2008. An investigation of some properties of banana yogurts made with commercial ABT‐2 starter culture during storage. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 61(3): 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2008. 00409.x
Baykara E. 2019. Muzun Besin Değeri ve Muz Tüketiminin Faydaları. Available from: https://www.fitnessbilim.com/ blog/muz-besin-degeri-ve-muz-tuketimi-faydalari/ [Accessed 21 December 2020].
Bernat N, Cháfer, M, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C. 2014. Vegetable milks and their fermented derivative products. International Journal of Food Studies, 3(1): 93-124. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/3.1.2014.a9
Bernat N, Cháfer M, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C. 2015. Probiotic fermented almond “milk” as an alternative to cow-milk yoghurt. International Journal of Food Studies, 4(2): 201-211. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a8
Çakmakçı S, Türkoğlu H, Çağlar A. 1997. Meyve çeşidi ve muhafaza süresinin meyveli yoğurtlarin bazi kalite kriterleri üzerine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3): 390-404.
Can Z. 2014. Biyoaktiviteleri yönünden türkiye florasına ait baskın ballar ile manuka ballarının karşılaştırılması. PhD Dissertation. Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey.
Cassady B A, Hollis J H, Fulford A D, Considine R V, Mattes R D. 2009. Mastication of almonds: effects of lipid bioaccessibility, appetite, and hormone response. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(3): 794-800. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.26669
Cemeroğlu B. 1982. Meyve suyu üretim teknolojisi. Ankara, Türkiye: Teknik Basım Sanayii Matbaası.
Chalupa-Krebzdak S, Long C J Bohrer B M. 2018. Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives. International Dairy Journal, 87: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.07.018
Degeest B, Vaningelgem F, De Vuyst L. 2001. Microbial physiology, fermentation kinetics, and process engineering of heteropolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria. International Dairy Journal, 11(9): 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00118-2
Doğan M. 2011. Rheological behaviour and physicochemical properties of kefir with honey. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 6(3): 327-332. I https://doi.org/1 0.1007/s00003-010-0643-6
Ediboğlu Koç İ. 2019. Muzun Faydaları ve Besin Değeri Nelerdir. Available from: https://www.supplementler.com/ bilgi-bankasi/muzun-faydalari-nelerdir-muz kac-kaloridir [Accessed 2 Marc 2010].
Erdogan F S, Ozarslan S, Guzel-Seydim Z B, Taş T K. 2019. The effect of kefir produced from natural kefir grains on the intestinal microbial populations and antioxidant capacities of Balb/c mice. Food Research International, 115: 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.080
Erk G, Seven A, Akpınar A. 2019. Vegan ve vejetaryan beslenmede probiyotik bitkisel bazlı süt ürünlerinin yeri. The Journal of Food, 44(3): 453-462. https://doi.org/ 10.15237/gida.GD18083
Flamm G, Glinsmann W, Kritchevsky D, Prosky L, Roberfroid M. 2001. Inulin and oligofructose as dietary fiber: a review of the evidence. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 41(5): 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091091841
Fontán M C G, Martínez S, Franco I, Carballo J. 2006. Microbiological and chemical changes during the manufacture of Kefir made from cows’ milk, using a commercial starter culture. International Dairy Journal, 16(7): 762-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.07.004
Hafliger M, Spillmann H, Puhan Z. 1991. Kefir-a fascinating cultured milk product. Lebensmittelindustrie und Milchwirtschaft, 112(13): 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9168-0
Hakim M A, Huq A O, Alam M A, Khatib A, Saha B K, Haque K F, Zaidul I S M. 2012. Role of health hazardous ethephone in nutritive values of selected pineapple, banana and tomato. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10(2): 247-251.
Harmankaya S, Gülbaz G, Kamber U. 2019. Microbiological, chemical and sensory characteristics of kefir prepared with various fruit additives. Van Veterinary Journal, 30(1): 13-18.
Karaca O B, Güven M, Saydam İ B. 2013. Set tipi yoğurtların bazı özellikleri üzerine dondurularak kurutulmuş trabzon hurması ve muz lifi ilavesinin etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Karataş Turizm İşletmeciliği ve Otelcilik Yüksek Okulu, Konaklama Bölümü Araştırma Projesi. Adana, Türkiye.
Karatepe P, Yalçın H. 2014. Kefirli sağlık. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2): 23-30.
Kavaz A. 2006. Ticari probiyotik kültür ile üretilen muzlu yoğurtların depolama süresince çeşitli niteliklerinin incelenmesi. MSc Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Koca A. 2016. Rendelenmiş Trabzon hurması, muz ve elme ilave edilerek üretilen kefir yoğurtlarının fiziksel, kimyasal ve duyusal özelliklerinin depolama süresince değişimi. MSc Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Kök-Taş T, Seydim A C, Özer B, an Guzel-Seydim Z B. 2013. Effects of different fermentation parameters on quality characteristics of kefir. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(2): 780-789. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5753
Libudzisz Z, Piatkiewicz A. 1990. Kefir production in Poland. Dairy Industries International, 55(7): 31-33.
Lopitz-Otsoa F, Rementeria A, Elguezabal N, Garaizar J. 2006. Kefir: a symbiotic yeasts-bacteria community with alleged healthy capabilities. Revista Iberoamericana Micología, 23(2): 67-74.
Machado T A D G, de Oliveira M E G, Campos M I F, de Assis P O A, de Souza E L, Madruga, M S, et al. 2017. Impact of honey on quality characteristics of goat yogurt containing probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 80: 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.lwt.2017.02.013
Moshfegh A J, Friday J E, Goldman J P, Ahuja J K C. 1999. Presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of Americans. The Journal of Nutrition, 129(7): 1407S-1411S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/129.7.1407S
Mutlu C, Erbaş M, Tontul S A. 2017. Bal ve diğer arı ürünlerinin bazı özellikleri ve insan sağlığı üzerine etkileri. Akademik Gıda, 15(1): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.24323/akademik-gida.306074
Özer H B, Atamer M. 1994. Serum proteinlerinin yogurt jelin kıvamına etkisi. Gıda Dergisi, 18: 1-5.
Tamime A Y, Saarela A, Korslund-Sondergaard A, Mistry V V, Shah N P. 2005. Production and maintenance of viability of probiotic micro-organisms in dairy products. In: Tamime A (editor). Probiotic Dairy Products. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp.39-97.
Türk Gıda Kodeksi (TGK) 2017. Türk Gıda Kodeksi Beslenme ve Sağlık Beyanları Yönetmeliği. Ek-2 Hastalık Riskinin Azaltılmasına, Çocukların Gelişimi ve Sağlığına İlişkin Beyanlar Dışındaki Sağlık Beyanları Listesi. Resmî Gazete Sayı: 29960 (Mükerrer), Available from: https://kms.kaysis.gov.tr/ Home/Goster/95841 [Accessed 20 December 2021].
Topçuoğlu E. 2019. Badem sütü ile zenginleştirilmiş probiyotik yogurt üretimi. MSc Thesis, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Tratnik L, Božaniċ R, Herceg Z, Drgalić I. 2006. The quality of plain and supplemented kefir from goat’s and cow’s milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 59(1): 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2006.00236.x
Ünal R N, Besler H T. 2008. Beslenmede sütün önemi. Ankara, Türkiye: Klasmat Matbaacılık. ISBN: 978-975-590-243-2
Uslu G. 2010. Ankara’da satışa sunulan kefirlerin mikrobiyolojik, fiziksel, kimyasal ve duyusal özelliklerinin araştırılması. MSc Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Walstra P. 1983. Formation Emulsion. In: Becher P (editor). Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 57–127.
Yaygın H. 1999. Yoğurt Teknolojisi. Antalya, Türkiye: Akdeniz Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Yılmaz Ersan L, Topçuoğlu E. 2019. Badem Sütü ile Zenginleştirilmiş Probiyotik Yoğurtların Mikrobiyolojik ve Bazı Fiziko-Kimyasal Özellikleri. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2): 321-339
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
