Determining the Effect of Water Consumption and Different Photosynthetic Photon Flux Densities on Yield of Lettuce Grown in a Hydroponic System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i8.2109-2121.9181

Keywords:

Lettuce, hydroponic, water culture, PAR, NFT, PLC, PPFD

Abstract

This study aimed to determine crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and evaluate the effects of different photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) on the growth and yield of hydroponically grown lettuce cultivated in a modified Nutrient Film Technique (MNFT) system. The experimental system consisted of three vertically arranged PVC growing channels equipped with a PLC-based automation and control system. White LED projectors were installed above the upper channel to create three PPFD treatments. Average PPFD values measured at the plant canopy level were 160, 260, and 320 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹, designated as PPFD160, PPFD260, and PPFD320, respectively. Forty-two ‘Maritima’ lettuce seedlings were transplanted into the system and grown for 59 days. Nutrient solution electrical conductivity (EC), pH, temperature, relative humidity, and water consumption were continuously monitored. Daily crop evapotranspiration ranged from 0.0046 to 0.11 L plant⁻¹, while total ETc reached 3.3 L plant⁻¹ during the growing period. A strong power-function relationship was observed between cumulative ETc and growing days (ETc = 0.0022GD¹·⁷⁵, R² = 0.98). Final whole plant fresh weights under PPFD160, PPFD260, and PPFD320 were 143.86, 311.77, and 498.98 g plant⁻¹, respectively. Statistical analyses indicated that PPFD significantly affected total plant weight, head weight, and root weight (p < 0.01). Lettuce grown under higher PPFD levels produced greater biomass and yield components than plants grown under lower light intensity. The results demonstrated that increasing PPFD enhanced plant growth and productivity in the MNFT system while maintaining efficient water use. These findings provide useful information for optimizing artificial lighting and irrigation management in hydroponic lettuce production systems.

References

Aydın, H. (2018). Akuaponik sistemlerde kıvırcık marul (Lactuca sativa) yetiştiriciliği. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.

Barbosa, G. L., Almeida Gadelha, F. D., Kublik, N., Proctor, A., Reichelm, L., Weissinger, E., Wohlleb, G. M., & Halden, R. U. (2015). Comparison of land, water, and energy requirements of lettuce grown using hydroponic vs. conventional agricultural methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 6879–6891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606879

Borowski, E., Michalek, S., Rubinowska, K., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., & Grudzinski, W. (2015). The effects of light quality on photosynthetic parameters and yield of lettuce plants. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 14(5), Article 5.

Bourget, C. M. (2008). An introduction to light-emitting diodes. HortScience, 43(7), 1944–1946.

Chowdhury, M. E., Khandakar, A., Ahmed, S., Al-Khuzaei, F., Hamdalla, J., Haque, F., & Al-Emadi, N. (2020). Design, construction and testing of IoT based automated indoor vertical hydroponics farming test-bed in Qatar. Sensors, 20(19), Article 5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20195637

Cometti, N. N., Bremenkamp, D. M., Galon, K., Hell, L. R., & Zanetti, M. F. (2013). pH and EC monitoring in NFT hydroponic system for lettuce production. Horticultura Brasileira, 31(3), 401-405.

Dar, N. A., Shah, I. A., Bhat, G. A., Makhdoomi, M. A., Iqbal, B., Rafiq, R., ... & Shah, S. A. (2013). Socioeconomic status and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk in Kashmir, India. Cancer Science, 104(9), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12210

Domingues, D. S., Takahashi, H. W., Camara, C. A. P., & Nixdorf, S. L. (2012). Automated system developed to control pH and concentration of nutrient solution evaluated in hydroponic lettuce production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 84, 53-61.

Dutta Gupta, S., & Agarwal, A. (2017). Artificial lighting system for plant growth and development: Chronological advancement, working principles, and comparative assessment. In S. Dutta Gupta (Ed.), Light Emitting Diodes for Agriculture: Smart Lighting (pp. 1–25). Springer.

Fu, W., Li, P., & Wu, Y. (2012). Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae, 135, 45–51.

Gençoğlan, C., Gençoğlan, S., Küçüktopcu, E., Uçak, A. B., & Kıraç, A. M. (2013). Ultrasonik Algılayıcı Kullanarak A Sınıfı Buharlaşma Kabındaki Su Yüksekliğinin Ölçülmesi. III. Ulusal Toprak ve Su Kaynakları Kongresi, Tokat, Turkey.

Gençoğlan, C., Gençoğlan, S., Başpınar, A., & Uçak, A. B. (2015a). Programlanabilir Kontrol Cihazı (PLC)’nın Sulama Otomasyonunda Kullanımı. 2. İç Anadolu Bölgesi Tarım ve Gıda Kongresi, Nevşehir, Turkey.

Gençoğlan, C., & Gençoğlan, S. (2015b). Basınç Transduserü ve Programlanabilir Lojik Kontrol (PLC) Kullanarak Buharlaşma Kabındaki Su Yüksekliğinin Ölçülmesi ve Elle Ölçülen Değerlerle Karşılaştırılması. 1. Biyosistem Mühendisliği Kongresi, Bursa, Turkey.

Gençoğlan, C., & Gençoğlan, S. (2016). Basınç transdüseri ve programlanabilir lojik kontrol (PLC) kullanarak buharlaşma kabındaki su yüksekliğinin ölçülmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 35-43.

Gençoğlan, C., & Tüysüz, M. D. (2018). Using Programmable Logic Control (PLC), Flow Key Curve, pressure and Ultrasonic sensors to measure water flow in open chanel. In T. Binici, E. Sakin, O. Çopur, G. Ö. Özbakır, İ. Odabaşoğlu, & E. Şimşek (Eds.), 1st International GAP Agriculture and Livestock Congress Proceedings Book (pp. 144-149). Şanlıurfa, Turkey.

Gençoğlan, C., & Gençoğlan, S. (2021). Modeling Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Measurement in Workshop Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(11), 2027-2034.

Gençoğlan, C., Gençoğlan, S., & Usta, S. (2021). Designing Class A Pan Automation System (CAPAS) Based on Programmable Logic Control (PLC) And Testing. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 38(1), 1-10.

Goins, G. D., Ruffe, L. M., Cranston, N. A., Yorio, N. C., Wheeler, R. M., & Sager, J. C. (2001). Salad crop production under different wavelengths of red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (SAE Technical Paper No. 2001-01-2422). SAE International.

Gonnella, M., Serio, F., Conversa, G., & Santamaria, P. (2002). Yield and quality of lettuce grown in floating system using different sowing density and plant spatial arrangements. Acta Horticulturae, 614, 687–692.

Jia, X., Speck, A., Feng, X., & Lee, C. W. (2025). Impact of Water pH and Cultivar on Lettuce Growth, Water Use Efficiency, and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Deep Water Culture Systems. Water, 17(17), Article 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172637

Jones, J. B., Jr. (2005). Hydroponics: A practical guide for the soilless grower (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

Kaiser, C., & Ernst, M. (2012). Hydroponic lettuce [Publication ID-212]. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment.

Kang, J. H., Krishna Kumar, S., Atulba, S. L. S., Jeong, B. R., & Hwang, S. J. (2013). Light intensity and photoperiod influence the growth and development of hydroponically grown leaf lettuce in a closed-type plant factory system. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 54(6), 501–509.

Kelly, N., Choe, D., Meng, Q., & Runkle, E. S. (2020). Promotion of lettuce growth under an increasing daily light integral depends on the combination of the photosynthetic photon flux density and photoperiod. Scientia Horticulturae, 272, Article 109565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109565

Legendre, R., & van Iersel, M. W. (2021). Supplemental far-red light stimulates lettuce growth: Disentangling morphological and physiological effects. Plants, 10(1), Article 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010166

Majid, M., Khan, J. N., Shah, Q. M. A., Masoodi, K. Z., Afroza, B., & Parvaze, S. (2021). Evaluation of hydroponic systems for the cultivation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., var. Longifolia) and comparison with protected soil-based cultivation. Agricultural Water Management, 245, Article 106572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106572

Massa, G. D., Kim, H. H., Wheeler, R. M., & Mitchell, C. A. (2008). Plant productivity in response to LED lighting. HortScience, 43(7), 1951–1956.

McCree, K. J. (1972). Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data. Agricultural Meteorology, 10, 443–453.

MEGEP. (2008). Tarım Teknolojileri: Topraksız Tarım [Agricultural Technologies: Soilless Agriculture]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.

Nicole, C. C. S., Charalambous, F., Martinakos, S., Van De Voort, S., Li, Z., Verhoog, M., & Krijn, M. P. C. M. (2016). Lettuce growth and quality optimization in a plant factory. Acta Horticulturae, 1134, 231–238.

Okasha, A. M., Eldib, E. M., Elmetwalli, A. H., Farooque, A. A., Yaseen, Z. M., & Elsayed, S. (2022). Maximization of water productivity and yield of two iceberg lettuce cultivars in hydroponic farming system using magnetically treated saline water. Agriculture, 12(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010101

Okudur, E. (2016). Durgun su kültüründe yetiştirilen marulda üç farklı şekilde verilen gübrelemenin verim ve kaliteye etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 80-89.

Olle, M., & Viršile, A. (2013). The effects of light-emitting diode lighting on greenhouse plant growth and quality. Agricultural and Food Science, 22(2), 223–234.

Oymak, E. (2018). Yapraktan uygulanan bazı mikro elementlerin su kültüründe yetiştirilen renkli marullarda yaprak renklenmesi ve verimlilik üzerine Akdeniz Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Sayfa 35, Antalya.

Pinto, D. (2022). HydroBuddy v1.85: An open source nutrient solution calculator. Retrieved from https://scienceinhydroponics.com/Sala, F. C., & Costa, C. P. (2012). Retrospectiva e tendência da alfacicultura brasileira. Horticultura Brasileira, 30(2), 187–194.

Savvas, D. (2003). Hydroponics: A modern technology supporting the application of integrated crop management in greenhouse. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1(1), 80–86.

Sebitosi, A. B., & Pillay, P. (2007). New technologies for rural lighting in developing countries: White LEDs. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 22(3), 674–679.

Silva, E. M., Lima, C. J. G. S., Duarte, S. N., Barbosa, F. S., Maschio, R. 2013. Níveis de salinidade e manejo da fertirrigação sobre características da berinjela cultivada em ambiente protegido. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v.44, p.150-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1806-66902013000100019

Soares, H. R., Silva, Ê. F. F., Silva, G. F., Pedrosa, E. M., Rolim, M. M., & Santos, A. N. (2015). Lettuce growth and water consumption in NFT hydroponic system using brackish water. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 19(7), 636–642.

Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2002). Plant physiology (3rd ed.). Sinauer Associates.

Texier, W. (2017). Hydroponics for everybody: All the skills and tools you need to grow food without soil. New Society Publishers.

Thomas, T., Biradar, M. S., Chimmad, V. P., & Janagoudar, B. S. (2021). Growth and physiology of lettuce cultivars under different growing systems. Plant Physiology Reports, 26(3), 526–534.

TUİK, 2025. Sebze ürünleri üretim miktarları. https://www.tarimsalistatistik.com/marul-uretim-verileri/?utm_source (Download date:12.06.2026)

Voudoukis, N., & Oikonomidis, S. (2017). Inverse square law for light and radiation: A unifying educational approach. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2(11), 23–27.

Wani, M. A., Jan, F. A., Khan, N. A., Pandita, K. K., Khurshid, R., & Khan, S. H. (2014). Cancer trends in Kashmir: Common types, site incidence and demographic profiles. Indian Journal of Cancer, 51(2), 133–137.

Yang, T., Samarakoon, U., & Altland, J. (2024). Growth, phytochemical concentration, nutrient uptake, and water consumption of butterhead lettuce in response to hydroponic system design and growing season. Scientia Horticulturae, 332, Article 113201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113201

Zha, L., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, C., & Shao, M. (2019). Morphological and physiological stress responses of lettuce to different intensities of continuous light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, Article 1440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01440

Zhou, J., Li, P., & Wang, J. (2022). Effects of light intensity and temperature on the photosynthesis characteristics and yield of lettuce. Horticulturae, 8(2), Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020178

Downloads

Published

25.08.2026

How to Cite

Gencoglan, C., & Gençoğlan, S. (2026). Determining the Effect of Water Consumption and Different Photosynthetic Photon Flux Densities on Yield of Lettuce Grown in a Hydroponic System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 14(8), 2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i8.2109-2121.9181

Issue

Section

Research Paper