The Classification of Germination Parameters Under Different Salinity Conditions Using Machine Learning Approaches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i7.1963-1970.8826

Keywords:

Classification, Abiotic stress, Zea mays L., Genotype selection, Machine learning algoriths

Abstract

Background: Soil salinity is a major abiotic stress affecting maize (Zea mays L.) production, leading to reduced germination and yield. Traditional breeding methods are resource-intensive and limited by environmental variability. This study explores machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify salinity stress levels based on germination parameters, aiming to enhance breeding efficiency for salt-tolerant genotypes. Methods: Germination data from 39 maize genotypes were collected under three salinity conditions (0 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM NaCl). Parameters included T10, T50, T90, T10-90, MGT, and Gmax. Data preprocessing involved normalization and feature selection using Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS). Five ML models BayesNet, Decision Table, Bagging, J48, and Random Forest were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, with performance metrics of accuracy, precision, and F-measure. Results: Using all features, Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (92.02%), followed by BayesNet (89.74%). After CFS (removing genotype and T10-90), BayesNet performed best (89.74%), while Random Forest slightly declined (87.46%). All models exceeded 87% accuracy, demonstrating robust classification of salinity levels. Conclusions: ML models effectively classify salinity stress in maize germination, even without certain parameters, supporting rapid genotype selection. This approach offers a scalable tool for improving agricultural resilience against salinization.

References

Akbari, M., Sabouri, H., Sajadi, S. J., Yarahmadi, S., & Ahangar, L. (2024). Classification and prediction of drought and salinity stress tolerance in barley using GenPhenML. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 17420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68392-w

Atanda, A. S., Olsen, M., Crossa, J., Burgueño, J., Rincent, R., Dzidzienyo, D., Beyene, Y., Gowda, M., Dreher, K., M. Boddupalli, P., Tongoona, P., Yirenkyi Danquah, E., Olaoye, G., & R. Robbins, K. (2021). Scalable sparse testing genomic selection strategy for early yield testing stage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 658978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.658978

Baburao, P. S., Kulkarni, R. B., Kharade, P. A., & Patil, S. S. (2023). Review of machine learning model applications in precision agriculture. In International Conference on Applications of Machine Intelligence and Data Analytics (ICAMIDA 2022) (pp. 916-930). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/978-94-6463-136-4_81

Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 114, 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011

Botero-Valencia, J., García-Pineda, V., Valencia-Arias, A., Valencia, J., Reyes-Vera, E., Mejia-Herrera, M., & Hernández-García, R. (2025). Machine learning in sustainable agriculture: systematic review and research perspectives. Agriculture, 15(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040377

Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine learning, 24(2), 123-140.

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.

Carpici, E. B., Celik, N., & Bayram, G. (2009). Effects of salt stress on germination of some maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(19). https://doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v8i19.65187

Chintakunta, A. N., Koganti, S., Nuthakki, Y., & Kolluru, V. K. (2023). Deep learning and sustainability in agriculture: A systematic review. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 12(8), 10-47760. https://doi.org/10.47760/ijcsmc.2023.v12i08.017

Cihan, P., & Kalipsiz, O. (2016). Determining the most successful classification algorithm for the student project questionnaire. TBV J Comput Sci Eng, 8(1), 41-49.

Collado, B. M., Beatriz Aulicino, M., Jacinto Arturi, M., & del Carmen Molina, M. (2016). Selection of maize genotypes with tolerance to osmotic stress associated with salinity. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 82-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2016.72008

Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004

Crossa, J., Montesinos-Lopez, O. A., Costa-Neto, G., Vitale, P., Martini, J. W., Runcie, D., ... & Ortiz, R. (2025). Machine learning algorithms translate big data into predictive breeding accuracy. Trends in Plant Science, 30(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2024.09.011

Gandhi, S. S., & Prabhune, S. S. (2017). Overview of feature subset selection algorithm for high dimensional data. In 2017 International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISC.2017.8068599

Gitmez, M., Karabatak, M., & Varol, A. (2019). Comparison of classification algorithms on optical burst switching network data. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK) (pp. 1-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/ubmyk48245.2019.8965474

Guo, S., Lv, L., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Lu, X., Zhang, M., Wang, R., Zhang, Y., & Guo, X. (2023). Using high-throughput phenotyping analysis to decipher the phenotypic components and genetic architecture of maize seedling salt tolerance. Genes, 14(9), 1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14091771

Ibrar, D., Khan, S., Raza, M., Nawaz, M., Hasnain, Z., Kashif, M., Rais, A., Gul, S., Ahmad, R., & Z. Gaafar, A. R. (2024). Application of machine learning for identification of heterotic groups in sunflower through combined approach of phenotyping, genotyping and protein profiling. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58049-z

Isik, H., Tasdemir, S., Selim Taspinar, Y., Kursun, R., Cinar, I., Yasar, A., Tahsin Yasin, E., & Koklu, M. (2023). Maize seeds forecasting with hybrid directional and bi‐directional long short‐term memory models. Food Science & Nutrition, 12(2), 786-803. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3783

ISTA. (2015). International Rules for Seed Testing. International Seed Testing Association.

Keleş, A. E., & Keleş, M. K. (2018). Prediction of employee leadership perception in construction management using feature selection with genetic algorithm. Journal of Çukurova University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 33(4), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.525060

Khalid, N., Tarnawa, Á., Balla, I., Omar, S., Abd Ghani, R., Jolánkai, M., & Kende, Z. (2023). Combination effect of temperature and salinity stress on germination of different maize (Zea mays L.) varieties. Agriculture, 13(10), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101932

Khan MA, Ahmed MZ, Hameed A. (2006). Effect of sea salt and L-Ascorbic acid on the seed germination of halophytes. Journal of Arid Environments, 67 (3): 535-540.

Kok, Z. H., Shariff, A. R. M., Alfatni, M. S. M., & Khairunniza-Bejo, S. (2021). Support vector machine in precision agriculture: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 191, 106546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106546

Luo, M., Zhao, Y., Weisong, W., Zhang, R., Su, A., Li, C., Wang, X., Xing, J., Shi, Z., & Zhao, J. (2017). Effect of saline stress on the physiology and growth of maize hybrids and their related inbred lines. Maydica, 62(2), 8.

Madhumitaa, P. S., Ragavi, C., Kiranmayi, C., & Prabhavathy, P. (2024). Drought and salinity stress classification in soyabean crops: Comparative analysis of machine learning models. In 2024 International Conference on Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT) (pp.1-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/IConSCEPT61884.2024.10627854

Maheswari, M. U., & Ramani, R. (2023). A comparative study of agricultural crop yield prediction using machine learning techniques. In 2023 9th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) (Vol. 1, pp. 1428-1433). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS57279.2023.10112854

Mohanavelu, A., Naganna, S. R., & Al-Ansari, N. (2021). Irrigation induced salinity and sodicity hazards on soil and groundwater: An overview of its causes, impacts and mitigation strategies. Agriculture, 11(10), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100983

Musleh, F. A. (2024). A comprehensive comparative study of machine learning algorithms for water potability classification. Int. J. Com. Dig. Sys, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/150184

Ozkan, S. S., & Ozkan, E. C. (2025). The effect of salinity stress on the germination and early growth parameters of selected ryegrass species. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14160787

Pitman, M. G., & Läuchli, A. (2002). Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems. Salinity: environment-plants-molecules, 3, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48155-3_1

Premasudha, B. G., Thara, D. K., & Tara, K. N. (2022). Ml based methods xgboost and random forest for crop and fertilizer prediction. In 2022 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) (pp. 492-497). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICN56167.2022.10008234

Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A. K., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends in plant science, 21(2), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015

Sun, Z., Sun, H., & Zhang, J. (2018). Multistep wind speed and wind power prediction based on a predictive deep belief network and an optimized random forest. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018(1), 6231745. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6231745

Tong, H., & Nikoloski, Z. (2021). Machine learning approaches for crop improvement: Leveraging phenotypic and genotypic big data. Journal of plant physiology, 257, 153354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153354

van Dijk, A. D. J., Kootstra, G., Kruijer, W., & de Ridder, D. (2021). Machine learning in plant science and plant breeding. Iscience, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101890

Wang, F., Shi, Z., Biswas, A., Yang, S., & Ding, J. (2020). Multi-algorithm comparison for predicting soil salinity. Geoderma, 365, 114211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114211

Zarbakhsh, S., Fakhrzad, F., Rajkovic, D., Niedbała, G., & Piekutowska, M. (2025). Approaches and challenges in machine learning for monitoring agricultural products and predicting plant physiological responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Current Plant Biology, 100535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100535

Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Du, W., Hu, M., Hao, Y., Ding, S., ... & Zhang, D. (2025). Machine learning analysis of maize seedling traits under drought stress. Biology, 14(7), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070787

Zulkadir, G. (2025). Salt tolerance of different maize genotypes during germination and seedling stages. Phyton, 94(6), 1879. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2025.064144

Downloads

Published

30.07.2026

How to Cite

Arslan, M. T., & Zulkadir, G. (2026). The Classification of Germination Parameters Under Different Salinity Conditions Using Machine Learning Approaches . Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 14(7), 1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i7.1963-1970.8826

Issue

Section

Research Paper