Parametric and Hybrid Growth Modeling for Final-Week Broiler Live Weight Prediction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i5.1360-1365.8783Keywords:
Broiler live weight, Growth models, Hybrid modeling, Gompertz, Uncertainty analysisAbstract
Accurate forecasting of broiler live weight near market age is essential for effective production planning and decision-making. This study proposes a hybrid modeling framework for predicting daily mean broiler live weight during the final production week (days 36–42) using only early growth data (days 1–35). Three parametric growth models Gompertz, Richards, and Von Bertalanffy were first fitted to daily mean live weight observations to provide baseline forecasts. A residual-based hybrid extension was then developed by training a gradient boosting regressor on lagged residuals, day index, and daily bird counts to refine late-stage predictions. Among the parametric models, the Gompertz formulation achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE = 33.807 g, MAE = 22.552 g, R²=0.975), outperforming the Richards and Von Bertalanffy models. Hybridization yielded modest but consistent improvements for all models, with the greatest benefit observed for the Gompertz-based hybrid. Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis demonstrated that hybrid model performance was robust to tuning choices, indicating low risk of overfitting. Prediction uncertainty was quantified using a moving block bootstrap approach, which revealed narrow confidence intervals for the Gompertz-based models and wider intervals for the alternative formulations. Overall, the results indicate that biologically grounded growth models remain highly effective for late-stage broiler weight forecasting, and that residual-based hybrid modeling serves as a refinement mechanism rather than a substitute for mechanistic representations. The proposed framework offers an interpretable, robust, and uncertainty-aware approach for practical broiler live weight prediction near market age.
References
Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., Kaveh, M., Jahanbakhshi, A. (2019). The effect of microwave and convective dryer with ultrasound pre-treatment on drying and quality properties of walnut kernel. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14178.
Aggrey, S. (2002). Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poultry science, 81(12), 1782-1788. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.12.1782.
Bergstra, J., Bengio, Y. (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(1), 281-305.
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer New York.
Chang, C.-L., & Xu, R.-Y. (2025). Optimizing Feeding Schedule and Live-Weight Prediction for Native Chicken Based on Machine Learning. Animals, 16(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16010075.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of the law of humanmortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonB:Biological Sciences, 182, 513-585.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning. In: Springer series in statistics New-York.
Lahiri, S. N. (2013). Resampling methods for dependent data: Springer Science & Business Media.
Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674.
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., Assimakopoulos, V. (2018). Statistical and Machine Learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward. PloS one, 13(3), e0194889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194889.
Narinç, D., Narinç, N. Ö., Aygün, A. (2017). Growth curve analyses in poultry science. World's Poultry Science Journal, 73(2), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916001082.
Richards, F. J. (1959). A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 10(2), 290-301.
Schweidtmann, A. M., Zhang, D., Von Stosch, M. (2024). A review and perspective on hybrid modeling methodologies. Digital Chemical Engineering, 10, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2023.100136.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1957). Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. The quarterly review of biology, 32(3), 217-231.
Zuidhof, M. (2005). Mathematical characterization of broiler carcass yield dynamics. Poultry science, 84(7), 1108-1122. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1108.
Zuidhof, M., Schneider, B., Carney, V., Korver, D., & Robinson, F. (2014). Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry science, 93(12), 2970-2982. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04291.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






