Relationships Between Body Hygiene Status and Behavioural Responses During Milking in Multiparous Buffalo Cows
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i3.814-819.8727Keywords:
Anatolian buffalo, cleanliness scores, milking behaviors, body hygiene status, Temperament dynamicsAbstract
This observational study aimed to determine the relationships between behavioral responses during milking and body hygiene scores (BHS) in multiparous Anatolian water buffalo cows. The study was conducted on 45 multiparous buffalo cows housed in a semi-open barn with a concrete floor on a commercial farm in Samsun, Türkiye. Data relating to observations, behaviour and scoring during milking were collected twice, at one-week intervals. The body hygiene status of Anatolian water buffalo cows was assessed based on four anatomical regions: the udder, the upper rear limb, the lower rear limb and the tail. Each region was scored on a five-point scale, ranging from 1 (entirely clean) to 5 (manure encrusted). Then, individual BHS were obtained by calculating a weighted index reflecting the impact of dirtiness levels in these regions on overall hygiene. In addition, kicking, stepping, vocalizing, defecating, urinating, pulling the teat cup off, turning head back and tail wagging behaviours were recorded as either present or absent through direct observation, in order to assess behavioural responsiveness during milking. Cows with a BHS value of 2 or below were classified as having low BHS, while those with a BHS value of 3 or above were classified as having high BHS. The relationship between BHS and behavioural responsiveness in cows was analysed using chi-squared independence and Spearman correlation tests in SPSS. Cows with low BHS showed less frequent kicking, stepping, pulling the teat cup off, turning head back and tail wagging behaviors compared to those with high BHS. There were positive correlations between BHS and the behavioural traits such as kicking, stepping, defecating, pulling the teat cup off, turning head back and tail wagging. This present study highlights the benefit of considering milking behaviors or temperament dynamics to understand the complexity of animal-based factors influencing the body hygiene status of cows.
References
Akdağ, A., Okuyucu, İ.C., Erdem, H., Kul, E., & Ocak, N. (2024). Some Welfare Assessment Traits and Quantitative-Qualitative Milk Parameters as Affected by Supplementary Feeding at Milking and Parity in Anatolian Buffalo Cows. Animals, 14(6), 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060956.
Avcı, H. (2015). A study on determination of structural and spatial properties of buffalo barn in European side of Istanbul Province. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, MSc. Thesis, Main Science Division of Biosystem Engineering, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Türkiye. [in Turkish]
Aytekin, İ., Altay, Y., Boztepe, S., Keskin, İ., & Zulkadir, U. (2021). The effect of body cleanliness (hygiene) score on some criteria used in the detection milk quality in dairy cattle. Large Animal Review, 27(2), 69-74.
Bulu A. (2019). Relationships between body hygiene scores and milk components and somatic cell count in Anatolian buffaloes. Graduate School of Sciences, Master’s Thesis, Department of Animal Science, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye. [in Turkish]
Can, M. E. (2020). Hygiene conditions and animal-environment relations in farm animals barns. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.628540.
Cavallina, R., Roncoroni, C., Campagna, M. C., Minero, M., & Canali, E. (2008). Buffalo behavioural response to machine milking in early lactation. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 7(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2008.287.
Chen, J. M., Stull, C. L., Ledgerwood, D. N., & Tucker, C. B. (2017). Muddy conditions reduce hygiene and lying time in dairy cattle and increase time spent on concrete. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(3), 2090-2103. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11972.
De Rosa, G., Grasso, F., Pacelli, C., Napolitano, F., & Winckler, C. (2009). The welfare of dairy buffalo. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.103.
DeVries, T. J., Aarnoudse, M. G., Barkema, H. W., Leslie, K. E., & Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2012). Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. Journal of dairy science, 95(10), 5730-5739. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5375.
Dohmen, W., Neijenhuis, F., & Hogeveen, H. (2010). Relationship between udder health and hygiene on farms with an automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Science, 93:4019–4033.
Erdem, H., & Okuyucu, I. C. (2019). Influence of hygiene status of cows on somatic cell count and milk components during summer season. Large Animal Review, 25(1), 7-10.
Erdem, H., Atasever, S., & Okuyucu, I. C. (2022a). Relations of hygiene index scores with milk production in Anatolian buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin, 41(4), 615-621.
Erdem, H., Okuyucu, I. C., & Abaci, S. H. (2022b). Milking temperament of Anatolian buffaloes during early lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 253, 105679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105679.
Evans, J.D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove, Calif.
Frantz, L. M., Morabito, E. A., Dolecheck, K. A., & Bewley, J. M. (2019). A comparison of cow cleanliness, fly population, and fly avoidance behaviors among docked, switch-trimmed, and switch-intact dairy cows in 3 commercial dairy herds. Journal of dairy science, 102(2), 1584-1588. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14921.
Hristov, S. V., Mihajlović, L. S., Cincović, M. R., Dimitar, N. D., & Stanković, B. M. (2023). The improvement of the body and udder hygiene influence on the milk safety and composition on small dairy farms in Serbia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade, 68(1), 105-119.
Kathambi, E. K., VanLeeuwen, J. A., Gitau, G. K., & Kamunde, C. (2019). Risk factors associated with cows’ lying time, stall and cows’ own cleanliness in smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. Veterinary world, 12(7), 1085. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1085-1092.
Mendina, G. R., Damián, J. P., Meikle, A., Chilibroste, P., Bentancur, O., & Adrien, M. D. L. (2023). Udder hygiene and mastitis indicators in contrasting environmental conditions during half-time confinement in pasture-based dairy systems. Animals, 13(9), 1544.
Mota-Rojas, D., Bragaglio, A., Braghieri, A., Napolitano, F., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Mora-Medina, P., Álvarez-Macías, A., De Rosa, G., & Barile, V. L. (2022). Dairy buffalo behavior: Calving, imprinting and allosuckling. Animals, 12(21), 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212899.
Mota-Rojas, D., Rosa, G. D., Mora-Medina, P., Braghieri, A., Guerrero-Legarreta, I., Napolitano, F. (2019). Dairy buffalo behaviour and welfare from calving to milking. CABI Reviews, 1-9.
Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Grasso, F., Braghieri, A., & De Rosa, G. (2013). The behaviour and welfare of buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in modern dairy enterprises. Animal, 7, 1704–1713.
Napolitano, F., De Rosa, G., Chay-Canul, A., Álvarez-Macías, A., Pereira, A. M., Bragaglio, A., Mora-Medina, P., Rodríguez-González, D., García-Herrera, R., Hernández-Ávalos, I., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Pacelli, C., Casas-Alvarado, A., Reyes-Sotelo, B., & Braghieri, A. (2023). The challenge of global warming in water buffalo farming: Physiological and behavioral aspects and strategies to face heat stress. Animals, 13(19), 3103.
Napolitano, F., Serrapica, F., Braghieri, A., Masucci, F., Sabia, E., & De Rosa, G. (2019). Human-animal interactions in dairy buffalo farms. Animals 9 (5), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050246.
Okuyucu, İ.C., Akdağ, A., Erdem, H., Kop-Bozbay, C., Abacı, S.H., Garipoğlu, A.V., Hazneci E., & Ocak, N. (2024). Welfare assessment traits, milk quantity and quality, and profitability of Anatolian buffalo cows confined in closed-tied or semi-open free-stall barns can be affected by supplementary feeding at milking. Animal Bioscience, 37(6), 1110. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0366.
Özdemir, G. (2023). The Examining the Structural and Technical Characteristics of the Water Buffalo Farms in Sivas Province from the Perspective of Animal Welfare: The Structural and Technical Characteristics of the Water Buffalo Farms. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 74(3), 6039-6050. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.30720.
Reneau, J. K., Seykora, A. J., Heins, B. H., Endres, M. I., Farnsworth, R. J. & Bey, R. F. (2005). Association between hygiene scores and somatic cell scores in dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227:1297–1301.
Saber, A.A, Hassan, M.A., El Nabtiti, A.S., Hassan, A.M., & Mansour, S. R. (2017). Evaluation of field techniques to diagnose early subclinical mastitis in relation to hygiene score in a buffalo farm. Catrina: The International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16(1), 53-60.
Sant’Anna, A. C., & Da Costa, M. P. (2011). The relationship between dairy cow hygiene and somatic cell count in milk. Journal of dairy science, 94(8), 3835-3844. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3951.
Schreiner, D. A., & Ruegg, P. L. (2002). Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(10), 2503-2511. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74333-6.
Schreiner, D. A., & Ruegg. P. L. (2003). Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of dairy science, 86:3460–3465. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2.
Schütz, K. E., Cave, V. M., Cox, N. R., Huddart, F. J., & Tucker, C. B. (2019). Effects of 3 surface types on dairy cattle behavior, preference, and hygiene. Journal of dairy science, 102(2), 1530-1541. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14792.
Shahedani, M. S., Ahmadi, F., & Tosun, H. I. (2024). The impact of bedding materials and disinfectants on udder health and mastitis control in dairy cows. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 75(3), 8083-8098. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.37052.
Tucker, C. B., Fraser, D., & Weary, D. M. (2001). Tail docking dairy cattle: effects on cow cleanliness and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(1), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74455-4.
Vargas-Ramella, M., Pateiro, M., Maggiolino, A., Faccia, M., Franco, D., De Palo, P., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2021). Buffalo milk as a source of probiotic functional products. Microorganisms, 9(11), 2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112303.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
