AI-Assisted Plate Counting for Accurate OD600–CFU Calibration in Some Wheat Rhizosphere-Related Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolates

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i5.1340-1348.8675

Keywords:

Pseudomonas fluorescens, optical density, colony-forming unit, Artifical Intelligence (AI), bacterial quantification, OD600-CFU calibration

Abstract

Optical density at 600 nm (OD600) is widely used to estimate bacterial cell density, yet the conversion of OD600 values to viable cell counts (CFU.mL⁻¹) is often based on generic factors that ignore strain-level variability. This practice can introduce substantial quantitative error, particularly in plant–microbe interaction studies where precise inoculum standardization is essential. In this study, we investigated the strain-specific relationship between OD600 and CFU.mL⁻¹ in five environmental isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens using an AI-assisted colony counting approach. Serial dilutions covering a wide OD600 range were plated and enumerated using a semi-automated image analysis pipeline with manual verification. For each isolate, calibration curves were constructed by relating OD600 to log10-transformed CFU.mL⁻¹ values. Model fitting showed that a logarithmic function provided the best description of the OD–CFU relationship across the tested range (R² = 0.88–0.97). When OD600 values corresponding to the 0.5 McFarland standard (0.08) were applied to isolate-specific models, predicted viable counts varied by up to ~4.2-fold among isolates. One-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant isolate effect on CFU estimates. These findings demonstrate that OD600–CFU relationships are not conserved even within a single bacterial species and that reliance on generic conversion factors can lead to substantial over- or underestimation of viable cell numbers. The AI-assisted workflow enabled the generation of dense, statistically robust calibration datasets that would be impractical with manual counting alone. We conclude that isolate- and instrument-specific OD–CFU calibration should be considered a methodological requirement for quantitative microbiology, particularly in plant science, biocontrol, and microbial ecology studies.

References

Begot, C., Desnier, I., Daudin, J. D., Labadie, J. C., & Lebert, A. (1996). Recommendations for calculating growth parameters by optical density measurements. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 25(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(95)00090-9

Cao, L., Zeng, L., Wang, Y., Cao, J., Han, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Zhong, G., & Qiao, S. (2024). U²-Net and ResNet50-Based Automatic Pipeline for Bacterial Colony Counting. Microorganisms, 12(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010201

Chen, S., Huang, P.-H., Kim, H., Cui, Y., & Buie, C. R. (2025). MCount: An automated colony counting tool for high-throughput microbiology. PLoS ONE, 20(3): e0311242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311242

Dalgaard, P., Ross, T., Kamperman, L., Neumeyer, K., & McMeekin, T. A. (1994). Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 23(3–4), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)90165-1

Ferrari, A., Lombardi, S., & Signoroni, A. (2015). Bacterial colony counting by convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 7458–7461). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320116

Finkel, S. E., & Kolter, R. (1999). Evolution of microbial diversity during prolonged starvation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(7), 4023–4027. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.4023

Geissmann, Q. (2013). OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects. PLOS ONE, 8(2), e54072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054072

Graczyk, K. M., Pawłowski, J., Majchrowska, S., & Golan, T. (2022). Self-normalized density map (SNDM) for counting microbiological objects. Scientific Reports, 12, 10583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14879-3

Haas, D., & Défago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129

King, E. O., Ward, M. K., & Raney, D. E. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 44(2), 301–307. (PubMed PMID: 13184240)

Koch, A. L. (1970). Turbidity measurements of bacterial cultures in some available commercial instruments. Analytical Biochemistry, 38(1), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(70)90174-0

Lugtenberg, B. J. J., & Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 63, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918

Makrai, L., Fodróczy, B., Nagy, S. Á., Czeiszing, P., Csabai, I., Szita, G., & Solymosi, N. (2023). Annotated dataset for deep-learning-based bacterial colony detection. Scientific Data, 10, 497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02404-8

Meyer, J. M. (2000). Pyoverdines: pigments, siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent Pseudomonas species. Archives of Microbiology, 174(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030000188

Mira, P., Yeh, P., & Hall, B. G. (2022). Estimating microbial population data from optical density. PLoS ONE, 17(10), e0276040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276040

Stevenson, K., McVey, A. F., Clark, I. B., Swain, P. S., & Pilizota, T. (2016). General calibration of microbial growth in microplate readers. Scientific Reports, 6, 38828. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38828

Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlström, C. I., & Müller, D. B. (2017). Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host & Microbe, 22(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.004

Wang, H., Gu, C. M., Xu, S., Wang, H., Zhao, X., & Gu, L. (2024). Measurement of optical density of microbes by multi-light path transmission method. mLife, 3(4), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/mlf2.12147

Worth, R. M., & Espina, L. (2022). ScanGrow: Deep Learning-Based Live Tracking of Bacterial Growth in Broth. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 900596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.900596

Zhang, X., Yang, Q., Ma, L., Zhang, D., Lin, W., Schlensky, N., … Qu, K. (2023). Automatically showing microbial growth kinetics with a high-performance microbial growth analyzer (HPMGA). Biosensors & Bioelectronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115626

Downloads

Published

11.05.2026

How to Cite

Issaka Ibrahima, F., Aksoy Mirza, C., Canik Orel, D., & Demirci, F. (2026). AI-Assisted Plate Counting for Accurate OD600–CFU Calibration in Some Wheat Rhizosphere-Related Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolates. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 14(5), 1340–1348. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i5.1340-1348.8675

Issue

Section

Research Paper