Divergent Regulation of Trehalose Accumulation by Exogenous Proline in Drought-Stressed Sorghum and Maize
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i2.457-465.8475Keywords:
Drought stress , Maize , Proline , Sorghum , TrehaloseAbstract
This study investigated the effects of varying water availability and exogenous proline application on trehalose accumulation in two economically important crops, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and maize (Zea mays L.), which exhibit distinct drought tolerance strategies. The experiment was conducted under controlled conditions with four water availability levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25%) and three proline concentrations (200, 400, and 600 mg/L). Leaf area and leaf curling were also measured to verify the successful establishment of drought stress prior to biochemical analyses. Trehalose content was determined at the V8 growth stage using a modified enzymatic assay. Results showed a reduction in leaf area with decreasing water availability and a concurrent rise in leaf curling, confirming effective induction of drought stress. Maize displayed stronger curling responses, whereas sorghum largely maintained leaf structural integrity. Regarding trehalose, sorghum naturally accumulated higher levels under severe drought stress without proline, indicating a robust innate stress response. In contrast, maize exhibited lower trehalose levels under the same conditions but showed a marked increase with proline application, suggesting a greater reliance on external osmoprotectants. Under moderate and mild stress, proline enhanced trehalose accumulation in both crops, though the response was more consistent in sorghum. Interestingly, under optimal water conditions, proline application increased trehalose levels in sorghum but had minimal effect on maize, highlighting differences in the metabolic utilization of proline. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of tailoring proline application strategies based on crop-specific stress responses and environmental conditions to optimize drought resilience. This study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between water availability, proline, and trehalose metabolism, offering potential pathways for improving crop stress tolerance in drought-prone regions.
References
Abdallah, M. M. S., Abdelgawad, Z. A. & El-Bassiouny, H. M. S. (2016). Alleviation of the adverse effects of salinity stress using trehalose in two rice varieties. South African Journal of Botany, 103, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.019
Acosta-Pérez, P., Camacho-Zamora, B. D., Espinoza-Sánchez, E. A., Gutiérrez-Soto, G., Zavala-García, F., Abraham-Juárez, M. J., & Sinagawa-García, S. R. (2020). Characterization of Trehalose-6-phosphate Synthase and Trehalose-6-phosphate Phosphatase Genes and Analysis of its Differential Expression in Maize (Zea mays) Seedlings under Drought Stress. Plants, 9(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030315
Ali, Q. & Ashraf, M. (2011). Induction of Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.) due to Exogenous Application of Trehalose: Growth, Photosynthesis, Water Relations and Oxidative Defence Mechanism. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00463.x
Ashraf, M. & Foolad, M. R. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59, 206–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
Baloch, F. S., Altaf, M. T., Liaqat, W., Bedir, M., Nadeem, M. A., Cömertpay, G., Çoban, N., Habyarimana, E., Barutçular, C., Cerit, I., Ludidi, N., Karaköy, T., Aasim, M., Chung, Y. S., Nawaz, M. A., Hatipoğlu, R., Kökten, K., & Sun, H. J. (2023). Recent advancements in the breeding of sorghum crop: current status and future strategies for marker-assisted breeding. Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1150616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1150616
Bänziger, M., Edmeades, G. O. & Lafitte, H. R. (2002). Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance, Field Crops Research, 75 (2–3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00028-X.
Becker, A., Schloder, P., Steele, J. E. & Wegener, G. (1996). The regulation of trehalose metabolism in insects. Experientia 52, 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01919312
Eh, T., Jiang, Y., Jiang, M., Li, J., Lei, P., Ji, X., Kim, H., Zhao, X. & Meng, F. (2024). The role of trehalose metabolism in plant stress tolerance. Journal of Advanced Research, 76, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.12.025
El-Bashiti, T., Hamamci, H., Oktem, H.A. & Yucel, M. (2005). Biochemical analysis of trehalose and its metabolizing enzymes in wheat under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Science, 169(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.024
Elbein, A. D., Pan, Y. T., Pastuszak, I. & Carroll, D. (2003). New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology 13(4), 17R–27R. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwg047
Fernandez, O., Bethencourt, L., Quero, A., Sangwan, R. S. & Clement, C. (2010). Trehalose and plant stress responses: friend or foe? Trends Plant Science, 15(7), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.004
Funck, D., Winter, G., Baumgarten, L. & Forlani, G. (2012). Requirement of proline synthesis during Arabidopsis reproductive development. BMC Plant Biology, 12, 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-191
Garg, A. K., Kim, J. K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., & Wu, R. J. (2002). Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(25), 15898–15903. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252637799
Habibur Rahman Pramanik, M., & Imai, R. (2005). Functional identification of a trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase gene that is involved in transient induction of trehalose biosynthesis during chilling stress in rice. Plant Molecular Biology, 58(6), 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-7404-4
Hare, P. D., Cress, W. A. & Van Staden, J. (1998). Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell and Environment, 21, 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00309.x
Hayat, S., Hayat, Q., Alyemeni, M. N., Wani, A. S., Pichtel, J. & Ahmad, A. (2012). Role of proline under changing environments: a review. Plant Signalling and Behavior, 7(11), 1456–66. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21949
Iturriaga, G., Cushman, M. A. F. & Cushman, J. C. (2006). An EST catalogue from the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla reveals abiotic stress-adaptive genes Plant Science, 170(6), 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.02.004
Jagdale G. B. & Grewal, P. S. (2003). Acclimation of entomopathogenic nematodes to novel temperatures: trehalose accumulation and the acquisition of thermotolerance, International Journal for Parasitology, 33(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00257-6.
Kavi Kishor, P. B., Hima Kumari, P., Sunita, M. S., & Sreenivasulu, N. (2015). Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00544
Kibria, M. G., Farzana, K., Matin, M. A., & Hoque, M. A. (2016). Mitigating water stress in wheat (BARI Gom-26) by exogenous application of proline. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture, 1(3), 118–123. https://www.f2ffoundation.org/faa/index.php/home/article/view/79
Kibria, M. G., Kaniz, F., Matin, M. A., & Hoque, M.A. (2016). Mitigating water stress in wheat (barigom-26) by exogenous application of proline. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture, 1(3), 118-123. https://www.f2ffoundation.org/faa/index.php/home/article/view/79
Kishor, P. B. K. & Sreenivasulu, N. (2014). Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homoeostasis a more critical issue? Plant Cell and Environment, 37, 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12157
Kosar, F., Akram, N.A., Sadiq, M., Al-Qurainy, F. & Ashraf, M. (2018). Trehalose: a key organic osmolyte effectively involved in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 38 (2) (2018), pp. 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9876-x
Li, H. W., Zang, B. S., Deng, X. W., & Wang, X. P. (2011). Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene OsTPS1 enhances abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Planta, 234(5), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1458-0
Li, H., Liu, Y., Zhen, B., Lv, M., Zhou, X., Yong, B., Niu, Q., & Yang, S. (2024). Proline Spray Relieves the Adverse Effects of Drought on Wheat Flag Leaf Function. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 13(7), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070957
Liu, T., Ye, X.L., Li, M., Li, J.M., Qi, H.Y. & Hu, X.H. (2020). H2O2 and NO are involved in trehalose-regulated oxidative stress tolerance in cold-stressed tomato plants. Environ Exp Bot, 171, 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103961
Lunn, J. E., Delorge, I., Figueroa, C. M., Van Dijck, P., & Stitt, M. (2014). Trehalose metabolism in plants. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology, 79(4), 544–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12509
Morabito, C., Secchi, F., & Schubert, A. (2021). Grapevine TPS (trehalose-6-phosphate synthase) family genes are differentially regulated during development, upon sugar treatment and drought stress. Plant physiology and biochemistry: PPB, 164, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.04.032
Munns R. (2005). Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. The New phytologist, 167(3), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01487.x
Naeem, M., Naeem, M. S., Ahmad, R., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M.Y., Ihsan, M. Z., Nawaz, F., Athar, H. R., Ashraf, M., Abbas, H. T., & Abdullah, M. (2017). Improving drought tolerance in corn by foliar application of boron: Water status, antioxidative defense and photosynthetic capacity, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64(5), 626–639. http://10.1080/03650340.2017.1370541).
Noein, B., & Soleymani, A. (2022). Corn (Zea mays L.) physiology and yield affected by plant growth regulators under drought stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10332-3
Parrou, J. & François, J. (1997). A simplified procedure for a rapid and reliable assay of both glycogen and trehalose in whole cells. Analytical Biochemistry, 248, 186–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1997.2138
Paul, M. J., Gonzalez-Uriarte, A., Griffiths, C. A., & Hassani-Pak, K. (2018). The Role of Trehalose 6-Phosphate in Crop Yield and Resilience. Plant Physiology, 177(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01634
Perfect, J. R., Tenor, J. L., Miao, Y., & Brennan, R. G. (2017). Trehalose pathway as an antifungal target. Virulence, 8(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2016.1195529
Plénet, D., Mollier, A. & Pellerin, S. (2000). Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency. II. Radiation-use efficiency, biomass accumulation and yield components. Plant and Soil 224, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004835621371
Roy, D., Basu, N., Bhunia, A. & Banerjee, S. (1993). Counteraction of exogenous L-proline with NaCl in salt-sensitive cultivar of rice. Biologia Plantarum, 35, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921122
Semida, W. M., Abdelkhalik, A., Rady, M. O. A., Marey, R. A. & Abd El-Mageed, T. A. (2020). Exogenously applied proline enhances growth and productivity of drought stressed onion by improving photosynthetic efficiency, water use efficiency and up-regulating osmoprotectants. Scientia Horticulturae, 272, 109580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109580.
Szabados, L. & Savoure, A. (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Science, 15, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009
Tripathi, B. N., & Gaur, J. P. (2004). Relationship between copper- and zinc-induced oxidative stress and proline accumulation in Scenedesmus sp. Planta, 219(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-004-1237-2
Wang, F., Zeng, B., Sun, Z., & Zhu, C. (2009). Relationship between proline and Hg2+-induced oxidative stress in a tolerant rice mutant. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 56(4), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9226-2
Wang, Z., Wei, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Zou, F., Huang, S., Yang, X., Xu, Z. & Hu, H. (2022). Physiological and transcriptional evaluation of sweet sorghum seedlings in response to single and combined drought and salinity stress. South African Journal of Botany, 146, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.11.029.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
