Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Bacteria Against Angular Leaf Spot of Cucumber (Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans) and Their Effects on Growth Parameters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i3.742-751.8455

Keywords:

Biocontrol , Pathogen Interaction , Plant Growth , Endophytic Bacteria , Cucumber

Abstract

The yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) are significantly reduced due to Angular Leaf Spot (ALS), a disease caused by the biotic agent Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans (Psl). Previous studies have demonstrated that endophytic bacteria support plants in coping with biotic stress. In this context, 23 endophytic bacterial (EB) isolates, previously characterized in terms of their physiological and biochemical properties, were evaluated. The aim of this study was to identify the most effective isolate among these 23 EB strains in suppressing cucumber angular leaf spot caused by Psl. Additionally, their plant growth–promoting traits were investigated. Cucumber plants were grown first in trays and then in pots containing a peat–perlite (2:1) mixture. Endophytic bacteria were applied by (i) seed coating and (ii) soil drenching methods. The effectiveness of EB applications in suppressing ALS disease severity and their effects on shoot fresh and dry weight, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll content, and stem length were evaluated. Preliminary screening at the tray stage identified eight EB isolates as the most effective in reducing ALS disease severity. Three low-performing isolates were eliminated, and the remaining five isolates were further evaluated for their effects on cucumber plants. Among these, isolate T2K2 was identified as the most effective against ALS, while isolate V33K2 ranked second in disease suppression. The highest increase in root fresh weight was observed in the T2K2 and WCS365 treatments. In terms of shoot dry weight, WCS365 was the most successful treatment, whereas under disease pressure, isolate V33K1 resulted in a notable increase. According to 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the most successful isolates were identified as belonging to the genera Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter sp. The results demonstrate that these genera contribute positively to plant growth and health and may offer significant advantages in agricultural applications. Overall, the findings indicate that appropriate EB–pathogen–plant combinations hold substantial potential for disease control and plant growth promotion.

References

Agrios, G. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). ELSEVİER Academic press. https://doi.org 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.019

Akköprü, A. (2012). Hıyar Bakteriyel Köşeli Yaprak Leke Hastalığının (Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Lachrymans) Bazı Kök Bakterileriyle Biyolojik Savaşımı Üzerinde Araştırmalar. (Yayın No. 315688) [Doktora tezi Ege Üniversitesi].

Akköprü, A., & Özaktan, H. (2018). Identification of rhizobacteria that increase yield and plant tolerance to angular leaf spot disease in cucumber. Plant Protection Science, 54(2), 67-73. https://doi.org 10.17221/41/2017-PPS

Akköprü, A., Çakar, K., & Husseını, A. (2018). Biyotik Stres Altındaki Bitkilerde Endofit Bakterilerin Hastalık ve Bitki Gelişimi Üzerine Etkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 28(2), 200-208. https://doi.org 10.29133/yyutbd.418070

Akköprü, A., & Babier, Y. (2020). Çeşitli Kültür Bitkilerinden İzole Edilen Endofitik Bakterilerin Karakterizasyonu ve Bitki Patojeni Bakterilere Karşı Antagonistik Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(3), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.727138

Akköprü, A., Taşkın, B., Arpali, D., Uçar, C. P., Yardım, D. Ö., & Öztürkci, Y. (2025). Isolation and Characterization of Endophytic Bacteria from the Poaceae Family: Assessing Their Impact On Drought Stress and Plant Growth in Wheat. Journal of Crop Health, 77(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-025-01130-y

Ali, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R. (2012). Delay of flower senescence by bacterial endophytes expressing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113(5), 1139-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05409.x

Aravind R, Kumar A, Eapen S J & Ramana K V (2008). Endophytic bacterial flora in root and stem tissues of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) genotype: isolation, identification and evaluation against Phytophthora capsici. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 48(1), 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02486.x

Bazar, B., (2023). Farklı yetiştirme ortamlarda yetiştirilen hıyarlarda endofit bakteriler ve Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans'ın popülasyon dinamiği ve bitki sağlığına etkisi (Yayın no: 824788) [Yüksek Lisans tezi, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi].

Babier, Y., & Akköprü, A. (2020). Çeşitli kültür bitkilerinden izole edilen endofitik bakterilerin karakterizasyonu ve bitki patojeni bakterilere karşı antagonistik etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30(3), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.727138

Blée, E. (2002). Impact of phyto-oxylipins in plant defense. Trends in plant science, 7(7), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02290-2

Buchholz, K. (2021). The World Map of Drought Risk. Statista. Erişim tarihi: 4 Kasım 2022. Erişim adresi: https://www.statsta.com/chart/25101/countres-by-drought-rsk/2/6.

Bukhat, S., Imran, A., Javaid, S., Shahid, M., Majeed, A., & Naqqash, T. (2020. 1 Eylül). Communication of plants with microbial world: Exploring the regulatory networks for PGPR mediated defense signaling. Microbiological research, 238, 126486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126486

Chakraborty, U., Chakraborty, B., & Basnet, M. (2006). Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 46, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200510050

Chen, C., Xin, K., Liu, H., Cheng, J., Shen, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). Pantoea alhagi. a novel endophytic bacterium with ability to improve growth and drought tolerance in wheat. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 41564. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41564

Çelik, Y., & Akköprü, A. (2021, 13- 14 Kasım). Endofit Bakteriler ve Arbusküler Mikorhizal Fungusların Hıyar Köşeli Yaprak Leke Hastalığına Karşı Kullanımı [Bildiri Sunumu]. BALKAN SUMMIT 5th INTERNATIONAL APPLIED SCIENCES CONGRESS (pp.16), Edirne, Türkiye.

Farooq, M., Wahid. A., Kobayashi, N. (2009). Plant Drought Stress: Effects. Mechanisms and Management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12

Gao, Z., Zhang, B., Liu, H., Han, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Biological Control, 105, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007

Gupta, S., Radhakrishnan, A., Raharja-Liu, P., Lin, G., Steinmetz, L. M., Gagneur, J., & Sinha, H. (2015). Temporal expression profiling identifies pathways mediating effect of causal variant on phenotype. PLoS Genetics, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005195

Hallmann, J., Quadt-Hallman, A., Mahafee, W. F., & Kloepper, j. w. (1997). Bacterial endophtes in agricultural crop. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 43, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1139/m97-081

Kang S H, Cho H, Cheong H, Ryu C, Kim J F & Park S (2007). Two Bacterial Entophytes Eliciting Both Plant Growth Promotion and Plant Defense on Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 17(1), 96–103

Kavi Kishor, P. B., Sreenivasulu, N. (2014). Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homeostasis a more critical issue?. Plant. Cell and Environment, 37(2), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12157

Kaya, A., & İnan, M. (2018). Kuraklık ve Tuz Streslerine Maruz Kalan Tütün (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Bitkisinde Bazı Fizyolojik ve Biyokimyasal Parametreler Üzerine Melatoninin Etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(4), 559-564 https://doi.org.18016/ ksudobil.350965

King, E. O., Ward, M. K., Donald, E. D., Raney, A. B. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 44(2), 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/44.2.301

Kloepper, J.W., & Scroth, M. N. (1980). Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria ann Plant Growth Under Gnotobiotic Conditions. The American Phytopathological Society, https://doi.org.642-644. 10.1094/Phyto-71-642

Lelliott, R. A., & Stead, D. E. (1987). Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (UK) (pp. Vii+-216pp)., https://doi.org.10.5555/19871333217

Maheshwari, D. K., Dubey, R. C., Aeron, A., Kumar, B., Kumar, S., Tewari, S., & Arora, N. K. (2012). Integrated approach for disease management and growth enhancement of Sesamum indicum L. utilizing Azotobacter chroococcum TRA2 and chemical fertilizer. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28(10), 3015-3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1112-4

Muthukumar A, Nakkeeran S, Eswarana & Sangeetha G (2010). In vitro efficacy of bacterial endophytes against the chilli damping-off pathogen Pythium aphanidermatum. Phytopathol. Mediterr, 49, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-3088

Olczak-Woltman, H., Schollenberger, M., & Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. (2009). Genetic background of host-pathogen interaction between Cucumis sativus L. and Pseudomonas syringae pv. Lachrymans. Journal of Applied Genetics, 50, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195645

Olur, Ü., Uçar, C., & Akköprü, A. (2021). Tuz stresi altında gelişen bitkilerden izole edilen endofit bakterilerin bazı bitki gelişimini teşvik etme mekanizmalarının ve hıyar fide gelişimine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(3), 635-648. DOI: 10.37908/mkutbd.954216

Prabhukarthikeyan, R., Saravanakumar, D., & Raguchander, T. (2014). Combination of endophytic Bacillus and Beauveria for the management of Fusarium wilt and fruit borer in tomato. Pest Management Science, 70(11), 1742-1750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3719

Rabbee, M. F., Ali, M. S., Islam, M. N., Rahman, M. M., Hasan, M. M., & Baek, K. H. (2024). Endophyte mediated biocontrol mechanisms of phytopathogens in agriculture. Res. Microbiol, 175(104229), 10-1016. Doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2024.104229. Epub 2024 Jul 9. PMID: 38992820.

Rashid, M., Khan, A., Hossain, M. T., & Chung, Y. R. (2017). Induction of systemic resistance against aphids by endophytic Bacillus velezensis YC7010 via expressing PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 in arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00211

Romero, F. M., Marina, M., & Pieckenstain, F. L. (2016). Novel components of leaf bacterial communities of field-grown tomato plants and their potential for plant growth promotion and biocontrol of tomato diseases. Research in Microbiology, 167(3), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2015.11.001

Saygili, H., Aysan, Y., Ustun, N., Mirik, M., & Sahin, F. (2008). Pseudomonas syringae pathovars and related pathogens–Identification. Epidemiology and genomics. Tomato pith necrosis disease caused by Pseudomonas species in Turkey. 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6901-7

Schaller, F. (2000). Enzymes of the biosynthesis of octadecanoid-derived signalling molecules. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52(354), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.354.11

Takishita, Y., Charron, J. B., & Smith, D. L. (2018). Biocontrol rhizobacterium Pseudomonas sp. 23S induces systemic resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) against bacterial canker Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis. Frontiers in microbiology, 9, 2119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02119

Uçar, C.P (2024) Endofit Bakteri Uygulamalarının Biyotik ve Abiyotik Stres Altındaki Hıyarlarda Bazı Morfolojik Ve Fizyolojik Özellikler ile Gen Ifadelerine Etkileri (Yayın no: 849224) [Doktora tezi, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi].

Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255, 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893

Vigani, G., Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Dell’Orto, M., Michoud, G., Soussi, A., & Daffonchio, D. (2019). Root bacterial endophytes confer drought resistance and enhance expression and activity of a vacuolar H+-pumping pyrophosphatase in pepper plants. Environmental Microbiology, 21(9), 3212-3228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14272

Xu, W., Wang, F., Zhang, M., Ou, T., Wang, R., Strobel, G., & Xie, J. (2019). Diversity of cultivable endophytic bacteria in mulberry and their potential for antimicrobial and plant growth-promoting activities. Microbiological Research, 229, 126328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.126328

Downloads

Published

10.03.2026

How to Cite

Uçar, C. P., & Akköprü, A. (2026). Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Bacteria Against Angular Leaf Spot of Cucumber (Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans) and Their Effects on Growth Parameters. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 14(3), 742–751. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i3.742-751.8455

Issue

Section

Research Paper