An Assessment of the Profitability, Technical Efficiency, and Income Impact of Hybrid and Local Mustard Varieties of Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i5.1271-1278.8099Keywords:
profitability, adoption., technical efficiency, propensity score matching, income, and yieldAbstract
Hybrid mustard varieties have become increasingly important in the agriculture-led economy due to their potential for improving productivity, reducing crop losses, and contributing to the economic progress of Bangladesh. The study determines profitability, technical efficiency, the level of espousal of hybrid mustard varieties and assesses the income effect of mustard production. Overall, 150 farmers (90 for hybrid mustard growers and 60 for local mustard growers) were chosen from two upazila from Narsingdi district in Bangladesh. Purposive random sampling technique was utilized to obtain the samples. On average, total cost of production of hybrid and local mustard variety were Tk.70351 ha-1 and Tk. 56315 ha-1 , respectively. The average net returns of hybrid and local mustard cultivation were Tk. 22911 ha-1 and Tk. 11914 ha-1 respectively. For local and hybrid mustard production, the Benefit Cost Ratio was 1.21 and 1.32, respectively. To determine the factors affecting hybrid mustard production, the probit model was applied. The result indicates that experience, farm size, training, and a significant effect of extension services on adopting hybrid mustard variety. The study mentioned that human labor cost, land preparation cost, fertilizer cost had significantly and positively affected the yield of mustard. Technical efficiency was 93.15% and 90.84% for hybrid and local mustard farmers respectively and mustard productivity could be increased by increasing technical efficiencies in various issues including education, training and farm size. The results from propensity score matching revealed that hybrid mustard adopters had higher household income and yield compared with non-adopters.
References
Adegbola, P., & Gardebroek, C. (2007). The effect of information sources on technology adoption and modification decisions. Agricultural Economics, 37(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00222.x
Aziz, K. M. T., Razia, S., Ali, M. H., Hasanuzzaman, M., Sourav, T. A., & Masum, S. M. (2024). Growth and yield performance of mustard and rapeseed varieties as influenced by different sowing techniques. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal, 26(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.3329/baj.v26i2.76344
Bangladesh Bank. (2023). Yearly economic trends. Statistics Department, Bangladesh Bank.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Yearbook of agricultural statistics. Statistics and Information Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Begum, R., Sharmin, S., Mitra, S., Akhi, K., Deb, L., Kamruzzaman, M., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Production risk and technical inefficiency of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivation in Bangladesh: Do socio-economic factors matter? Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100417
Bitama, P. C., Nitunga, M. J. C., & Burny, P. (2024). Socio-economic factors influencing adoption of hybrid maize in Mbuye, Burundi. East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology, 7(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.7.2.2334
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). Production yearbook. FAO.
Islam, Q. M. S., Miah, M. A. M., & Alam, Q. M. (2007). Economic analysis of BARI Masur and Mustard cultivation in selected areas of Bangladesh: A comparative study. In Annual report 2006–07 (pp. 105–106). Agricultural Economics Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute.
Li, Y., Guo, L., & Kim, H. (2025). Adoption of smart farming technologies in South Korea: The role of farm size, farmer age, and policy support. Agriculture, 15(4), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040677
Miah, M. A. M., Akter, M. B., Khurram, M. M. H., Salam, M. A., & Uddin, M. A. (2010). Adoption of BARI mustard economy friendly agricultural technology in selected areas in Bangladesh. Journal, 3(2), 123–130.
Miah, M. M., & Rashid, M. A. (2015). Profitability and comparative advantage of oilseed production in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 38(3), 35–54. https://bids.org.bd/page/publications
Ministry of Agriculture. (2023). Agriculture division. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Murthy, D. S., Sudha, M., Hegde, M. R., & Dakshinamoorthy, V. (2009). Technical efficiency and its determinants in tomato production in Karnataka, India: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.57371
Rahman, S., Kazal, M. M. H., Begum, I. A., & Alam, M. J. (2016). Competitiveness, profitability, input demand and output supply of maize production in Bangladesh. Agriculture, 6(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6020021
Rayhan, S. J., Rahman, M. S., Sammy, H. M., & Saha, S. (2013). Profitability and resource use efficiency of mustard production in Sirajganj District, Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, 6(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v6i2.22103
Salam, M. A., Rashid, M. A., & Muktadir, M. A. (2012). Economic assessment of mustard and groundnut production in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture, 37(1), 1–10.
Sarkar, M. M. A., Rahman, M. H., Haque, M. R., Islam, S., & Sultana, R. (2020). An economic study of the oilseed mustard variety Binasarisha-4 production in some selected areas of Bangladesh. Power, 10(2), 1–9.
Sumon, M. S. M. M. (2013). Adoption of improved farm practices in rice cultivation by the farmers (Unpublished M.S. thesis). Department of Agricultural Extension and Information System, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka.
Uddin, M. A., Rahman, M. M., & Hossain, M. A. (2024). Farmers’ perception and financial profitability of mustard production in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 38(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjnag.v38i1.76567
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






