Linking Digital Agriculture Research and Export Outcomes: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Production and Marketing Dimensions (2020–2024)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i10.2156-2162.7873

Keywords:

Digital Agriculture Technologies, Agricultural Production, Agricultural Marketing, Agricultural Exports, Correlation Analysis

Abstract

This study first analyses the use of digital technologies in agriculture from two different perspectives. Then, correlation analyses using these data aim to show which countries focus on which of the two perspectives are ahead in agricultural exports. In the study, publications containing the word ‘agriculture’ in the title, abstract, or keywords section of the Scopus database and the keywords ‘digital technology’ and ‘production’ in the all-fields section were selected and recorded as publications in which digital technologies in agricultural production were investigated. Then, in the Scopus database, publications containing the word ‘agriculture’ in the title, abstract or keywords section and the words ‘digital technology’ and ‘marketing’ in the all-fields section were kept in a separate category and recorded as publications in which digital technologies in marketing of agricultural products were investigated. These two data sets were subjected to correlation analysis with export data obtained from OECD databases, and interactions on the axes of agriculture, digital technologies, production, and marketing were revealed. After selecting the OECD member countries with export data from all the data obtained, the number of academic publications of these countries with the specified conditions is given in separate tables. The correlation analysis on OECD member countries revealed a statistically significant and strong positive relationship between the average agricultural export volumes for 2020-2024 and the number of scientific publications containing the terms agriculture, digital technologies, and production indexed in the Scopus database. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated as r = 0.813, and the significance level was p = 0.004. When a similar correlation analysis was conducted with publications containing agriculture, digital technologies, and marketing terms, the Pearson correlation coefficient was r = 0.958 with a significance level of p < 0.001. This finding indicates that countries that produce higher levels of academic output in agriculture (publications containing both production and marketing terms) tend to have higher export performance in the agricultural sector. The results suggest that there may be a significant relationship between academic productivity and economic output in international agricultural trade.

References

Akintuyi, A. (2024). Adaptive AI in agriculture: Enhancing productivity and sustainability. Agricultural Systems, 58(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-025-00434-z

Arslan, A. and Güven, Ö. Z. (2020). Gtkm kapsamında akademisyenlerin çevrimiçi tatil satın alma davranışlarında ewom un etkisi (the effect of ewom on the online holiday purchase behaviors of academics within of etam). Journal of Business Research - Turk, 12(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.827

Beksultanova, R., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. (2023). Digital technologies adoption and economic benefits in agriculture. Sustainability, 16(11), 4431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114431

Birt, J., Lee, S., & Smith, K. (2012). Information technology in agricultural production: Improving data flow and decision support. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 78(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.04.005

Chiaraluce, F., Rossi, M., & Bianchi, P. (2024). Blockchain technology in agricultural supply chains: Enhancing security and transparency. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(4), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6

Gedik, A. (2023). Impact of digital transformation in agribusinesses on total factor productivity. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(5), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2023.0056

Kiambi, D. (2018). Communication technology in African agriculture: Improving information exchange and marketing. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(5), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2018.13045

Kosior, K. (2018). Towards a Common Agricultural Data Space in the European Union. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics – National Research Institute. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344672/files/Kosior.pdf

Leng, X., & Tong, G. (2022). The digital economy empowers the sustainable development of China’s agriculture-related industries. Sustainability, 14(17), 10967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710967

Lin, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Applications of blockchain technology to the sustainable food supply chain: The role of information transparency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120287

Luo, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Strategies selection for building e-commerce platforms for agricultural wholesale markets: A tripartite evolutionary game perspective. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0297360. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297360

MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., & Helming, K. (2022). Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42, 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6

Nemchenko, A. S., Alekseeva, N. A., & Lyashenko, V. I. (2020). Digital transformation of agricultural production: Regional aspect. Scientific Horizons, 23(1), 12–19.

Prashanth, J. S., Krishna, G. B., Prasad, A. V. K., & Rao, P. R. (2025). Smart Farming Revolution: A Cutting-Edge Review of Deep Learning and IoT Innovations in Agriculture. Operations Research Forum, 6, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-025-00434-z

Wei, W., Xiao, M., Duan, W., Wang, H., Zhu, Y., Zhai, C., & Geng, G. (2024). Research progress on autonomous operation technology for agricultural equipment in large fields. Agriculture, 14(9), 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091473

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big Data in Smart Farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023

Yaman, H. (2021). The impact of digitalization on export of high technology products: A panel data approach. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 31(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1965645

Yaman, H., Sungur, O., & Dulupçu, M. A. (2021). Dünyada tarım ve hayvancılığın dönüşümü: Teknolojiye dayalı uygulamalar ve devrimler. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 27(2), 123–133

Yechin, N., Kitayov, Y., Kravchenko, D., Pak, Z., & Chovgan, N. (2021). Features of the digitalization impact on the functioning of agricultural enterprises. BIO Web of Conferences, 39, 09004. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213909004

Zhang, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2021). The role of e-commerce in the agricultural supply chain: Evidence from China. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 45, 101015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101015

Downloads

Published

13.10.2025

How to Cite

Seren, N. (2025). Linking Digital Agriculture Research and Export Outcomes: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Production and Marketing Dimensions (2020–2024). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 13(10), 2966–2972. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i10.2156-2162.7873

Issue

Section

Research Paper