Determination of Comfort Zones in Landscape Planning in Niğde

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11is1.2518-2524.6417

Keywords:

Climate, Climatic Comfort, Geographic Information Systems, Landscape Plan, Niğde

Abstract

Our cities, most of which do not show planned development, are turning into ecosystems that threaten the living life of the natural and cultural environment as a result of many environmental problems such as increasing human and building density and incorrect land use. This negative situation has the opportunity to be resolved with urban planning in which the physical structure of the city is balanced and with landscape plans that will create open and green areas in the city that contribute positively to human and environmental health. The urban heat island effect, which has emerged as a result of intense urbanization in recent years, creates problems for city residents. Unfortunately, most cities in the world face this negative climate phenomenon. It becomes difficult to combat the heat island effect, especially in cities where construction density increases unconsciously. Ecological planning appears as a factor that will prevent these problems from turning into important environmental problems in the future. The most important component to be considered in ecological planning is climate. In this study, thermal comfort areas were tried to be determined along Dr Sami Yağız Street, which is one of the most frequently used areas of Niğde. Temperature and humidity measurements were taken at 25 points at equal intervals on both sides of the street. Measurements were made on different days of the week and at 4 different times during the day. The obtained values were transferred to ArcGIS 10.3 software and maps were produced. A universal linear extension system was used in the evaluation of climate data, and climate factors and bioclimatically suitable areas on the street were determined and evaluated in terms of comfort level. It has been determined that the humidity rate in the study area varies according to measurement hours, and there is no significant change in temperature.

References

Anonymous. 2023. https://www.accuweather.com/tr/tr/nigde/ 319795/january-weather/319795. Accesed Date: 11.09.2023

Balık H, Yüksel ÜD. 2014. Planlama sürecine iklim verilerinin entegrasyonu. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, (2), 1-6.

Bulgan E, Yılmaz S, Matzarakis A, Irmak MA. 2014. Quantification of summer thermal bioclimate of different land uses in an urban city centre. IC2UHI3, October 13-15 2014, Venezia, Italy, pp: 523-534.

Canan F, Golasi I, Ciancio V, Coppi M, Salata F. 2019. Outdoor thermal comfort conditions during summer in a cold semi-arid climate. A transversal field survey in Central Anatolia (Turkey). Building and Environment, 148, 212-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.008

Canan F, Geyikli HB. 2023. Dış Mekân Gölgeleme Elemanlarının Termal Konfor Koşullarına Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(2), 684-694. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1215174

Carlson A. 2010. Contemporary environmental aesthetics and the requirements of environmentalism. Environmental Values, 19(3), 289-314. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327110X519844

Çetin M. 2015. Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 187, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3

Cetin M. 2016. Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: Cide coastline example. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 4(9), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i9.800-804.872

Cetin M, Topay M, Kaya LG, Yılmaz, B. 2010. Efficiency of bioclimatic comfort in landscape planning process: case of Kutahya. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Seri A, (1), 83-95.

Dihkan M, Karsli F, Guneroglu N, Guneroglu A. 2018. Evaluation of urban heat island effect in Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3533-3

Erkek E, Kalaycı Ö, Başaran N, Ayça Ö, Rutkay A, Lamba H, Ağaçsapan B. 2020. Examining the relationship between bioclimatic comfort and land use using GIS and RS techniques: The example of Izmir province. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Science and Engineering Sciences, 20(1), 174-188. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.634985

Kestane Ö, Ülgen K. 2013. Determination of bioclimatic comfort zones for Izmir province. Journal of Technical Sciences, 3(1), 18-25.

Landsberg HE. 1981. Urban Climate (1st ed.). London, UK:Academic Press. ISBN: 0-12-43-5960-4, 271 p.

Nordh H, Alalouch C, Hartig T. 2011. Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban forestry & urban greening, 10(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003

Oke TR. 1987. Boundary Layer Climates (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN: 9780203407219, 464 p.

Parsons R, Daniel TC. 2002. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00051-8

Payton S, Lindsey G, Wilson J, Ottensmann JR, Man J. 2008. Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51(6), 717-736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802423509

Unger J. 1999. Comparisons of urban and rural bioclimatological conditions in the case of a Central-European city. International Journal of Biometeorology, 43, 139-144.

United Nations, 2018. The world’s cities in 2018: data booklet. Department of Economic and SocialAffairs,http://www.un.org/en/events/citie sday/assets/pdf/the_worlds_cities_in_2018_data _booklet.pdf. (Accessed date: July 26, 2023)

Topay M, Yılmaz B. 2004. Having Bioclimatic Comfort Using GIS to Determine Areas Possibilities: Muğla Province Example. Proceedings of 3rd GIS Days in Turkey, 425-434.

Yılmaz S, Mutlu E, Yılmaz H. 2017. Effects of Plant Usage on Urban Thermal Comfort for Sustainable Cities. 8th Atmospheric Science Symposium, Oral presentation, ATMOS 2017, 1-4 November 2017, İstanbul, Istanbul Technical University, pp: 712-719.

Zengin M, Yılmaz S, Mutlu BE. 2019. Analysis of Atatürk University Campus Thermal Camera Images in terms of Spatial Thermal Comfort. Ataturk University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 50(3), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.535209

Downloads

Published

30.12.2023

How to Cite

Soydan, O. (2023). Determination of Comfort Zones in Landscape Planning in Niğde . Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 11(s1), 2518–2524. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11is1.2518-2524.6417

Issue

Section

Research Paper

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>