Evaluation of Composts from Agroindustrial Wastes as an Alternative Growing Media Against Cocopeat for Soilless Tomato Cultivation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i3.454-459.5703

Keywords:

Topraksız tarım, Kompost, Domates, Verim, Tarımsal atık

Abstract

The importance of environmentally friendly and renewable materials for sustainable soilless agriculture is increasing day by day. Compost obtained from green and organic wastes is one of these materials. In this study, effects of compost obtained from apple, grape and tomato wastes in soilless tomato cultivation were investigated. Apple, grape and tomato wastes obtained from fruit juice and tomato paste factories. Apple, grape and tomato wastes were composted separately. In making compost, 200 dm3 of farmyard manure, 5 kg of lime and 5 kg of urea were added to the main material (2 m3). Composting took 22 weeks. In the study, 9 different media were used. These are; cocopeat: perlite (2:1) (Control); tomato compost: perlite (2:1) (D); apple compost: perlite (2:1) (E); grape compost: perlite (2:1) (Ü); tomato: apple: grape compost: perlite (1:1:1:1) (DEU); tomato compost: cocopeat: perlite (1:1:1) (DC); apple compost: cocopeat: perlite (1:1:1) (EC); grape compost: cocopeat: perlite (1:1:1) (DC) and DEU compost: cocopeat: perlite (1:1:1) (DEUC). Media were determined on a volume basis. Nutrient solution (EC before flowering: 2,0 dS/m, EC after flowering: 2,2 dS/m, pH:5,9) was used for fertigation. The highest marketable yield was 286,59 tons/ha in apple, tomato and grape compost + cocopeat media. The use of compost provided a 39,73% increase in marketable yield compared to the control. While Vit. C was highest in the control, pH and water-soluble dry matter did not change. The use of compost reduced blossom end rot in tomato fruits and increased leaf dry weight. As a result, it was understood that the compost obtained from grape fruit and especially apple fruit wastes can be used successfully in soilless tomato cultivation and is more effective than the cocopeat, which is one of the commercial environments.

References

Atzori G, Nissim WG, Rodolfi L. 2020. Algae and Bioguano as promising source of organic fertilizers. J. Appl. Phycol, 32: 3971–3981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02261-7

Barrett GE, Alexander PD, Robinson JS, Bragg NC. 2016. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems—A review. Sci. Hortic., 212: 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030

Branch K, Esfahan I. 2010. Effects of the substrate on tomato in soilless culture. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 6(6): 923-927.

Canellas LP, Olivares FL. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014, 1: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3

Ceglie FG, Bustamante MA, Ben Amara M, Tittarelli F. 2015. The challenge of peat substitution in organic seedling production: Optimization of growing media formulation through mixture design and response surface analysis. PLoS One 10:1–14. e0128600. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0128600

Cendón Y, Moldes A, Barral MT. 2008. Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost as a growing media component for potted plant production. Acta Hortic. 779, 591–598. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.779.76

Chrysargyris A, Stamatakis A, Prasad M, Tzortzakis N. 2018. Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost and/or fertigation as peat substituent for pepper seedlings production. Waste Biomass Valor9, 2285-2294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0124-6

Cozzolino V, Di Meo V, Monda H, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. 2016. The molecular characteristics of compost affect plant growth, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil microbial community composition. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 52: 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1046-8

Dehnavard S, Souri MK, Mardanlu S. 2017. Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40(3): 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1240191

Diacono M, Montemurro F. 2019. Olive pomace compost in organic emmer crop: yield, soil properties, and heavy metals’ fate in plant and soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19 (1): 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-0010-3

Eklind Y, Rämert B, Wivstad M. 2001. Evaluation of growing media containing farmyard manure compost, household waste compost or chicken manure for the propagation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) transplants. Biol. Agric. Hortic, 19: 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2001.9754919

Farrell M, Jones DL. 2010. Food waste composting: Its use as a peat replacement. Waste Manag. 30: 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.032

Giménez A, Fernández JA, Pascual JA, Ros M, López-Serrano M, Egea-Gilabert C. 2019. An agroindustrial compost as alternative to peat for production of baby leaf red lettuce in a floating system. Scientia Horticulturae, 246: 907-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.080

Hagassou D, Francia E, Ronga D, Buti M. 2019. Blossom end-rot in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): A multi-disciplinary overview of inducing factors and control strategies. Scientia Horticulturae, 249: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta. 2019.01.042

Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1938. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. Circulation No. 347, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc2.ark:/13960/t51g1sb8j

Íñiguez-Covarrubias G, Ramírez-Meda W, Bernal-Casillas JDJ, Virgen-Calleros G. 2022. Use of By-Products from the Tequila Industry. Part 12: Composted Agave Bagasse for Growing Grape Tomatoes. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13(9): 1227-1232. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps. 2022.139083

Kowalska M, Delre A, Wolf O. 2021. EU Ecolabel Criteria for growing media and soil improvers. JRC Science for Policy Report. 158p.

Massa D, Bonetti A, Cacini S, Faraloni C, Prisa D, Tuccio L, Petruccelli R. 2019. Soilless tomato grown under nutritional stress increases green biomass but not yield or quality in presence of biochar as growing medium. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 60(6): 871-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00169-x

Massa D, Magán JJ, Montesano FF, Tzortzakis N. 2020. Minimizing water and nutrient losses from soilless cropping in southern Europe. Agric. Water Manag., 241, 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106395

Massa D, Prisa D, Lazzereschi S, Cacini S, Burchi G. 2018. Heterogeneous response of two bedding plants to peat substitution by two green composts. Hort. Sci., 45: 164–172. https://doi.org/10.17221/1/2017-HORTSCI

Mazuela P, Urrestarazu M, Salas MC, Guillén C, Sánchez JA. 2004. Comparison between different fertigation parameters and yield using pure compost and coir waste fibre in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv Pitenza) crop by soilless culture. Acta Hortic. 659: 653-656. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.659.84

Miyama Y, Kamiyama K, Tsujimoto W, Taira S, Terabayashi S. 2022. Effects of defoliation on the occurrence of internal browning in tomatoes grown in soilless cultures. Environmental Control in Biology, 60(2): 103-108. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.60.103

Nappi P, Barberis R. 1993. Compost as growing medium: Chemical, physical and biological aspects. Acta Hortic., 342, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.342.28

Prasad M, Maher MJ. 2001. The use of composted green waste (CGW) as a growing medium component. Acta Hortic., 549: 107–113.

Putra PA. Yuliando H. 2015. Soilless culture system to support water use efficiency and product quality: A review. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc., 3: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aaspro.2015.01.054

Raviv M, Lieth JH, Bar-Tal A. 2019. Soilless Culture: Theory and Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands 691 P.

Raviv M. 2013. Composts in growing media: What’s new and what’s next? Acta Hortic., 982: 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.982.3

Reis M, Inácio H, Rosa A, Caccedilio J, Monteiro A. 2001. Grape marc compost as an alternative growing media for greenhouse tomato. Acta Hortic. 554: 75-82. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.554.6

Schmilewski G. 2017. Growing media constituents used in the EU in 2013. Acta Hortic., 1168: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1168.12

Stoffella PJ, Kahn BA. 2001. Compost utilization in horticultural cropping systems. CRC press.

Traka-Mavrona E, Gerasopoulos D, Pritsa T, Maloupa E. 2001. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato in relation to substrate and nutrient source in a soilless culture system. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Growing Media and Hydroponics, Kassandra, Macedonia, Greece, 31 August-6 September, 1999.

Zoes V, Paré T, Dinel H, Dumontet S, Pasquale V, Scopa A. 2011. Growth and yield of tomato cultivated on composted duck excreta enriched wood shavings and source-separated municipal solid waste. Ital. J. Agron., 6: 6–10. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2011.e2

Published

26.03.2023

How to Cite

Kartal, H., & Geboloğlu, N. (2023). Evaluation of Composts from Agroindustrial Wastes as an Alternative Growing Media Against Cocopeat for Soilless Tomato Cultivation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 11(3), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i3.454-459.5703

Issue

Section

Research Paper